|
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations
|
Good/Meets Most Expectations
|
Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations
|
|
Points Possible
|
5
|
4
|
3-1
|
POINTS EARNED =
|
(5 points)
Part I
a.) What is the underlying theory supporting the personality assessment you took?
|
Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Fully supports description that explains how this assessment is an example of the theory selected.
|
Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Needs some additional detail to explain how this assessment is an example of the theory selected.
|
Attempts to identify the theory on which the assessment is based. May identify incorrect personality theory OR needs significant detail to support theory selected.
|
Feedback Comments:
3
|
Points Possible
|
20-19
|
18-15
|
14-1
|
POINTS EARNED =
|
(20 points)
b.) Discuss the results of your assessment to show an understanding of the variables being assessed and the results.
|
Complete discussion of assessment results to show an understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Fully supports discussion.
|
Discusses assessment results to show an understanding of theory and most of the variables being assessed. Needs minor additional detail or support to be complete.
|
Partial discussion of assessment results. Demonstrates partial understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Needs significant detail or support to be complete.
|
Feedback Comments:
20
|
Points Possible
|
30-28
|
27-22
|
21-1
|
POINTS EARNED =
|
(30 points)
c.) Application of assessment: Describe two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mention terms or traits from the personality assessment.
|
Describes at least two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of event. Mentions the terms/traits in the personality assessment. Examples properly apply concepts from assessment/theory and show understanding of the personality trait in question.
|
Describes two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mentions some of the terms or traits from the personality assessment. Examples properly apply most concepts from assessment/theory and show some understanding of the personality trait in question. Needs minor additional detail to be complete.
|
Attempts to describe two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Demonstrates partial application of the results throughout examples OR example(s) are not appropriate application of results. Needs significant detail or support to be complete.
|
Feedback Comments:
30
|
Points Possible
|
25-24
|
23-19
|
18-1
|
POINTS EARNED =
|
(25 points)
Part II. Describe which theory most accurately explains personality development psychodynamic, humanistic, or cognitive-social. Justifies how this theory applies to personality development.
|
Demonstrates ability to describe and apply theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Justifies how the theory applies to and exemplifies personality development. Fully supports description.
|
Demonstrates some ability to describe and justify theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs minor additional detail or support.
|
Provides description of a personality theory and attempts to apply and justify how theory explains personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs significant detail or support to be complete.
|
Feedback Comments:
25
|
|
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations
|
Good/Meets Most Expectations
|
Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations
|
|
Points Possible
|
10-9
|
8-7
|
6-1
|
POINTS EARNED =
|
(10 points)
Writing Mechanics
sentence structure, run-ons, fragments, agreement, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, etc.
|
Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics, enhances the readability
|
Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics but with errors that may detract from the readability
|
Difficulties with readability due to inappropriate use of writing mechanics
|
Feedback Comments:
10
|
Points Possible
|
10-9
|
8-7
|
6-1
|
POINTS EARNED =
|
(10 points)
Writing Organization
Coherence: all writing fits together, makes sense, and flows in effective order – beginning, middle, end
Clarity: all writing is consistent and logical
|
Coherence: Well organized and purposeful writing; has beginning, middle, and end; strong and appropriate transitions
Clarity: Expresses ideas clearly and logically
|
Coherence: Sequence of information difficult to follow; lacks a clear beginning, middle, and end; few or inappropriate transitions
Clarity: Attempts to express ideas clearly; sometimes difficult to follow
|
Coherence: Unclear; lacks beginning, middle and end; fails to use transitions appropriately
Clarity: Disjointed connection of ideas; difficult to follow
|
10
|
|
For each requirement not completed, points(s) will be deducted as explained below.
(Maximum Deduction 10 Points)
|
POINTS DEDUCTED:
|
Requirements for basic APA document formatting and citations
(Maximum Deduction 10 Points)
|
Your assignment requires the following:
- Name at top of document (-1 point)
- 1 inch margins (-1 point)
- Times/Times New Roman font (-1 point)
- 12 point font (-1 point)
- Double spaced (-1 point)
- Informal citations within the worksheet (-1 point)
- Informal list of references (-2 points)
- Quotation marks when directly quoting a source (-2 points)
|
Feedback Comments:
|
|
FINAL SCORE: 98
|
Additional Feedback Comments:
|