9
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal
Student Name:
Institution:
Course Name / Number:
Instructor Name:
Date:
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal
Bioterrorism/Disaster Preparedness
Planning Before Teaching
Name and Credentials of Teacher:
|
|
Estimated Time Teaching Will Last: 30 Minutes |
Location of Teaching: Cary Crist Assisted Living Facility NPI Number: 1003024845 Address: 1706 Sw 136th Pl, Miami, FL, 33175 Phone: 305-553-7491; Fax: 305-225-1289
|
Supplies, Material, Equipment Needed: Writing Material and Snacks |
Estimated cost: $30
|
Community and Target Aggregate: Location Employees (All ages)
|
|
Topic: Disaster Preparedness (Hurricanes)
|
Identification of Focus for Community Teaching
This presentation that I will do on 15th November 2020 will teach five employees from Cary Crist Assisted Living Facility to prepare for disasters, particularly hurricanes. Usually, natural disasters are sudden catastrophic, and people cannot prevent it because they occur due to a natural process (Wang & Paul, 2020). Hurricane occurs seasonally, mainly between 1st June and 30th November, with September being the peak month. Individuals can minimize the destruction of properties and deaths through a good disaster management program. It is a collective responsibility to ensure that the elderly have everything they need since they can no longer care for themselves.
Epidemiological Rationale for Topic
Globally, natural disasters are responsible for about 0.1% mortalities (about 60,000 deaths) annually. The number can change depending on the magnitude of the disaster and the preparedness of the affected people. About 40% of hurricanes in the United States hit Florida because of the surrounding waters' hotness creating perfect atmospheres to hit harder.
Teaching Plan Criteria
Nursing Diagnosis
Awareness for better learning to disaster preparedness
Readiness for Learning
Readiness for learning refers to an individual willingness and preparedness to gain knowledge from another individual and participate in the learning process. Some factors that show an individual is ready to learn for Cary Crist Assisted Living Facility employees will include emotional readiness like their level of anxiety (Alim, Kawabata & Nakazawa, 2015). For example, I can assess their willingness to learn by asking questions regarding their understanding of the situations and the preparedness that they may require. Besides, experimental readiness to learn involves how the background, skills, and the ability to learn of the individuals being taught will enhance their learning process (Alim et al., 2015). It is also essential to evaluate where teaching will occur since it plays a critical role in the whole process.
Learning Theory to Be Utilized
There are various teaching methods; I will utilize the “teach-back method” since it will help me realize if the team I am training understands every disaster preparedness component. The technique, also known as the show-me method, requires that an individual should be able to elaborate back, in their word, everything the trainer taught them (Farris, 2015).
How Does This HP2020 Objective Relate to Alma Ata’s Health for All Global Initiatives? Develop Behavioral Objectives (Including Domains), Content, and Strategies/Methods:
Staff members will name all the requirements for a disaster preparedness plan. Some of the necessities for disaster preparedness are water (one gallon per individual for sanitation and drinking for about three days. Others are first aid kits, flashlights, batteries, and a radio. Firstly, I will use a PowerPoint presentation to explain the necessary equipment; I will then ask how many of that equipment the people have or do not have. I will also discuss the significance of having adequate water since the elderly may become dehydrated. Finally, I will talk about the importance of having essential foodstuffs.
The employee will realize how to ignite a generator and the nearest exit doors, including the evacuation centers. Knowing how to use a generator properly will help the older participants feel secure, and the employees will have an easier time since everything will be functional. They have where to go in case of evacuation. I will explain generator ignition steps on handouts and distribute to each employer and locate the evacuation centers.
The staff will know emergency contact numbers to call when they need help. This will ensure that they do not freak out and have the numbers of the patients and their caregivers at hand, plus those of the emergency department. I will indicate the list of emergency personnel’s names on the handout.
What happens when people do not prepare for disasters? It will increase the impact of disasters on the assisted living facility, including the workers and the elderly. I will ask them to mention at least one thing that may occur.
Creativity
Creativity is essential in training so that the participants do not lose interest. Some of the creative things I will use in teaching are images since they are easier to remember than words.
Planned Evaluation of Objectives (Outcome Evaluation
I will measure the number of supplies needed for disaster readiness. I will also ensure that every staff member a minimum of three of the requirements. Secondly, I will evaluate whether the participants can switch on a generator and whether they know the nearest exits to evacuate the building. I will do this by asking them to show me how to practically turn a generator, including asking them where the closest doors are. Thirdly, the staff members will have to know the relevant emergency personnel they should contact in case of an emergency. I will assess this by asking the participants to mention some places to locate these people and their contacts. Finally, I will ensure they are conversant with the consequences of unpreparedness for a hurricane. Every participant will name at least a thing that is likely to occur in such cases.
Planned Evaluation of Goal
The planned evaluation aims to determine whether the employees understand whatever I have taught them during the presentation regarding preparedness for hurricanes.
Planned Evaluation of Lesson and Teacher (Process Evaluation)
I will assess the effectiveness of the training plan by asking questions at the end of the presentation. In the process, I will ensure that whatever they know is the correct one and fix anything incorrectly mentioned.
Barriers
One of the barriers that may arise during the presentation is interruptions, especially from the elderly participants, using cell phones and banging of doors. To handle the obstacles, I will ask everybody to switch off their mobile phones during the training session, making sure the room is quiet, and the environment is conducive for learning. Another barrier is noise making.
Therapeutic Communication
Therapeutic communication refers to how nurses interact with other people face to face to get their full attention. I will start my presentation by introducing myself and getting to know every other person (Sibiya, 2018). Secondly, I will ask the participants their viewpoints regarding hurricane disaster preparedness to realize everyone's opinion. Some of the methods I will utilize to display active listening skills include telling the participants the importance of listening during learning sessions (Sibiya, 2018). Also, I will ensure I use plain English in my explanations, including keeping the information short so that they do not lose focus. I will conclude my presentations by asking questions and allowing them adequate time to raise their concerns, clarifications, or questions. Finally, I will offer them some snacks after the presentation. Some of the non-verbal communication skills I would use are marinating eye contact, good posture, and body language. I will dress professionally and use a soft tone to improve my credibility and interest in the study subject.
References
Alim, S., Kawabata, M., & Nakazawa, M. (2015). Evaluation of disaster preparedness training and disaster drill for nursing students. Nurse education today, 35(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.016
Farris, C. (2015).The teach back method. Home healthcare now, 33(6), 344-345. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000244
Sibiya, M. N. (2018). Effective Communication in Nursing. Nursing, 19.
Wang, X. J., & Paul, J. A. (2020). Robust optimization for hurricane preparedness. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, 107464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.037
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
NRS-428VN | NRS-428VN-O502 | Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper | 100.0 | |||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
Content | 80.0% | |||||||
Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan | 15.0% | Summary of community teaching plan is omitted. | Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. Overall, the teaching plan is unclear. | Summary of community teaching plan is offered, but some elements are vague. Some rationale or evidence is needed for clarity and support. | Community teaching plan is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Minor rationale is needed for clarity or support. | Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with community teaching plan, detailed, and well supported. The presentation demonstrates an ability to create effective teaching plans relative to a population. | ||
Epidemiological Rationale for Topic | 15.0% | Epidemiological rationale for the topic is omitted. | Epidemiological rationale is unclear or incorrect. | Epidemiological rationale is summarized and provides some support for the topic. More information or evidence is needed for support. | Epidemiological rationale is provided and provides general support for the topic. Some detail is needed for clarity. | Strong epidemiological rationale is provided and demonstrates support for the topic presented. | ||
Evaluation of Teaching Experience | 20.0% | Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete. | Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear or underdeveloped. The narrative is not written in a manner that evaluates the experience. | Evaluation of teaching experience is summarized. Some aspects are vague. More detail is needed to fully illustrate an assessment of the experience. | Evaluation of the teaching experience is generally presented. Some detail is needed for clarity. | A comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience is presented. Insight into self-appraisal in regard to teaching is demonstrated. | ||
Community Response to Teaching Provided | 15.0% | Community response to teaching is omitted. | Community response to teaching is partially summarized. More information is needed. | A summary of the community response to teaching is presented. Some areas are unclear. More information is needed for support or clarity. | A description of community response to teaching is generally presented. Some information is needed for support or clarity. | A detailed description of community response to teaching is presented. | ||
Areas of Strength and Improvement | 15.0% | Areas of strength and improvement are omitted. | Areas of strength and improvement are partially discussed. | Areas of strength and improvement are generally discussed. | Areas of strength and improvement are discussed. | Areas of strength and improvement are thoroughly discussed. The author demonstrates insight into personal strengths and areas where improvement would be beneficial. | ||
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 20.0% | |||||||
Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 2.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 3.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
Total Weightage | 100% |
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
NRS-428VN | NRS-428VN-O502 | Benchmark - Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation | 120.0 | |||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
Content | 80.0% | |||||||
Presentation Based on Teaching Work Plan and Provider Feedback | 20.0% | Presentation is not based on a Teaching Work Plan. | Presentation partially based on a Teaching Work Plan. Documented provider feedback is not integrated. Major aspects are incomplete. More information is needed. | Presentation is generally based on Teaching Work Plan and any documented provider feedback. Some aspects are unclear. There are minor inconsistencies with Teaching Work Plan. | Presentation is based on Teaching Work Plan and any documented provider feedback. All aspects are generally consistent with Teaching Work Plan. | Presentation is clearly based on Teaching Work Plan and any documented provider feedback. All aspects are consistent with Teaching Work Plan. | ||
Presentation Based on Teaching Work Plan and Provider Feedback Presentation Provides Individualized Education to Diverse Patient Population in Appropriate Community Setting (C 3.3 Provide individualized education to diverse patient populations in a variety of health care settings.) | 20.0% | Presentation does not include individualized education to a diverse patient population in an appropriate community setting. | Presentation is incomplete. Significant information for the identified population is omitted or unclear. Some diverse attributes for that population are presented; not all attributes are relevant to the population. The presentation does not seem appropriate for the health care setting. There are major inaccuracies. More information is needed. | Presentation provides general information for the identified population. Some diverse attributes for that population are presented. Presentation is appropriate to the community setting chosen. At least one health care setting where this individual education plan could be used has been proposed. There are some inaccuracies. Minor detail or rationale is needed for support. | Presentation provides information for the identified population and includes many diverse attributes for that population. Presentation is pertinent to the community setting chosen. Some additional health care settings where this individual education plan could be used are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity. | Presentation provides specific information that focuses on the identified population and includes all diverse attributes for that population. Presentation is highly relevant to the community setting chosen. Additional health care settings where this individual education plan could be used are identified and highly relevant. The presentation demonstrates insight into providing individual education to diverse patient populations. | ||
Presentation of Content | 40.0% | The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. | The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. | ||
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 20.0% | |||||||
Layout | 5.0% | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. | ||
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 5.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | ||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. | Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. | Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. | ||
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
Total Weightage | 100% |

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com