PSYC 6393R: Capstone
Literature Review Matrix Template
References (complete APA format): Peer reviewed?
Yes or No What are the main ideas or themes from
this article? How do these main themes relate to
your Capstone problem?
1. Hom, M. A., Bauer, B. W., Stanley, I. H., Boffa, J. W., Stage, D. L., Capron, D. W., Schmidt, N. B., & Joiner, T. E. (2021). Suicide attempt survivors’ recommendations for improving mental health treatment for attempt survivors. Psychological Services, 18(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000415
yes This study identifies various avenues by which mental health treatment might be improved for suicide attempt survivors. This study also highlights the importance of leveraging the perspectives of individuals with lived experience in suicide prevention research
Sadly, I have not yet established a straightforward research topic. However, I do wish to write about suicide rates, depression, and mental health treatments across the board. Maybe do treatment options really prevent suicide and help the statistical rates of depression, suicide and self-harm.
2.
Mersky, J. P., Topitzes, J., Langlieb, J., & Dodge, K. A. (2021). Increasing mental health treatment access and equity through trauma-responsive care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(6), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000572
yes This article describes a Trauma Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (T-SBIRT) protocol that nonclinical providers can use to detect trauma-related mental health concerns in adults and link them to therapeutic services. Study results are presented that indicate it is feasible to implement T-SBIRT within a universal nurse home visiting program called Family Connects to enhance trauma and mental healthscreening and referral processes.
3.
Schueller, S. M., & Torous, J. (2020). Scaling evidence-based treatments through digital mental health. American Psychologist, 75(8), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000654
Yes This article discusses the challenges and opportunities for the use of technology to spread evidence- based treatments for mental health. It reviews considerations in five domains based on a framework that identifies factors of effective implementation. Technologies hold the potential to support mental health treatment delivery but need to be deployed in ways that
© 2020 Walden University
PSYC 6393R: Capstone
References (complete APA format): Peer reviewed?
Yes or No What are the main ideas or themes from
this article? How do these main themes relate to
your Capstone problem?
address these considerations. 4.
Anastasia, E. A., Guzman, L. E., & Bridges, A. J. (2022). Barriers to integrated primary care and specialty mental health services: Perspectives from Latinx and non-Latinx White primary care patients. Psychological Services. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000639
Yes The current set of studies examined integrated primary care (IPC) patients’ perceptions of barriers to accessing mental health care in IPC and specialty mental health (SMH) settings. Latinx and non-Latinx White IPC patients perceived fewer barriers to care in IPC than SMH, while a non-treatment-seeking community samples saw no differences in barriers to care across settings. Results generally support the benefits of offering behavioral health services in IPC settings.
5. Kurzawa, J., Danseco, E., Lucente, G., Huang, C., Sundar, P., & Allen-Valley, A. (2022). Advancing racial equity, diversity, and inclusion in Ontario’s child and youth mental health sector: Perspectives of agency leaders. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000336
Yes This study identifies current efforts underway to advance racial equity in the child and youth mentalhealth and addictions sector in Ontario. We believe leaders can learn from the early successes and challenges of these agencies outlined in this article to create more innovative and culturally responsive mental health services for all.
6.
Stein, G. L., Kulish, A. L., Williams, C. S., Mejia, Y. C., Prandoni, J. I., & Thomas, K. C. (2017). Latina/o parent activation in children’s mental health treatment: The role of demographic and psychological factors. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 5(4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000094
Yes The current study examined demographic and psychological factors associated with immigrant Latina/o parent activation in parents seeking mental health services for their children. Additionally, the study tested whether psychological factors (parental depressive symptoms, parenting stress, perceived severity of child psychopathology) were associated with the effectiveness of an activation intervention among immigrant Latina/o parents (MEPREPA—short for 'me preparo'/I prepare [MEtas, PReguntar, Escuchar, Preguntar para Aclarar/goals,
© 2020 Walden University
PSYC 6393R: Capstone
References (complete APA format): Peer reviewed?
Yes or No What are the main ideas or themes from
this article? How do these main themes relate to
your Capstone problem?
questioning, listening, questioning to clarify])
7.
Munson, M. R., Narendorf, S. C., Ben-David, S., & Cole, A. (2019). A mixed-methods investigation into the perspectives on mental health and professional treatment among former system youth with mood disorders. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000326
Yes This study illuminates important dimensions of illness and treatment perceptions among this marginalized population. Results can inform the development of future interventions to address the problem of unmet mentalhealth need among this group.
8. Weisz, J. R., Thurber, C. A., Sweeney, L., Proffitt, V. D., & LeGagnoux, G. L. (1997). Brief treatment of mild- to-moderate child depression using primary and secondary control enhancement training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 703–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.703
Yes Elementary school children with mild-to- moderate depressive symptoms were randomly assigned to a control group or an 8-session Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Training program. The program focused on (a) primary control (changing objective conditions to fit one's wishes; e.g., through activity selection and goal attainment) and (b) secondary control (changing oneself to buffer the impact of objective conditions; e.g., altering depressogenic thinking, practicing mood- enhancing cognitions ) .
9. Santiago, C. D., Raviv, T., Ros, A. M., Brewer, S. K., Distel, L. M. L., Torres, S. A., Fuller, A. K., Lewis, K. M., Coyne, C. A., Cicchetti, C., & Langley, A. K. (2018). Implementing the Bounce Back trauma intervention in urban elementary schools: A real-world replication trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000229
Yes This study advances the evidence for Bounce Back, a school-based intervention aimed at elementary school students exposed to traumatic events. Results show that the Bounce Back intervention, implemented by school-based mental health professionals, is effective in treating symptoms of posttraumatic stress and improving coping skills for low-income and highly stressed school-age children.
© 2020 Walden University
PSYC 6393R: Capstone
References (complete APA format): Peer reviewed?
Yes or No What are the main ideas or themes from
this article? How do these main themes relate to
your Capstone problem?
10. Lawrence, H. R., Nangle, D. W., Schwartz-Mette, R. A., & Erdley, C. A. (2017). Medication for child and adolescent depression: Questions, answers, clarifications, and caveats. Practice Innovations, 2(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000042
Yes To help make sense of this large, complex, and continually evolving literature and address some of the related controversies, this review is designed as a primer for practicing clinicians that poses and answers several key questions: (a) Are antidepressant medications effective for treating child and adolescent depression?; (b) How do antidepressants compare in effectiveness to psychotherapy and their combination?; (c) Do antidepressants impact long term outcomes and risk of relapse?; (d) Are antidepressants U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for use with children and adolescents?; a
11. Lewis, C. C., Simons, A. D., Silva, S. G., Rohde, P., Small, D. M., Murakami, J. L., High, R. R., & March, J. S. (2009). The role of readiness to change in response to treatment of adolescent depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014154
Yes treatment effects were mediated by change in action scores during the first 6 weeks of treatment, with increases in action scores related to greater improvement in depression. Assessing readiness to change may have implications for tailoring treatments for depressed adolescents.
12. Blashill, A. J., Fox, K., Feinstein, B. A., Albright, C. A., & Calzo, J. P. (2021). Nonsuicidal self-injury, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts among sexual minority children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000624
Yes This study shows that sexual minority children experience significant disparities in SITBs compared to their heterosexual peers. Future suicide prevention efforts targeting sexual minority children could reduce these disparities.
13. Pettersen, R., Omerov, P., Steineck, G., Titelman, D., Dyregrov, A., Nyberg, T., & Nyberg, U. (2015). Lack of trust in the health-care system after losing a child to suicide: A nationwide population survey. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide
yes Pettersen, R., Omerov, P., Steineck, G., Titelman, D., Dyregrov, A., Nyberg, T., & Nyberg, U. (2015). Lack of trust in the health-care system after losing a child to suicide: A nationwide population
© 2020 Walden University
PSYC 6393R: Capstone
References (complete APA format): Peer reviewed?
Yes or No What are the main ideas or themes from
this article? How do these main themes relate to
your Capstone problem?
Prevention, 36(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000312
survey. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 36(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227- 5910/a000312
14. Nakanishi, M., & Endo, K. (2017). National suicide prevention, local mental health resources, and suicide rates in Japan. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 38(6), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000469
Yes A community mental health system that operated in parallel to the current system may result in fewer inpatients and a reduction in Japan's suicide rate.
15.
© 2020 Walden University
NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY
If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the Focused SOAP Note Evaluation Template AND the Rubric as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. After reviewing full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.
In the Subjective section, provide:
· Chief complaint
· History of present illness (HPI)
· Past psychiatric history
· Medication trials and current medications
· Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis
· Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history
· Allergies
· ROS
Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
In the Objective section, provide:
· Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history
· Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.
Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
In the Assessment section, provide:
· Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form.
· At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case .
· Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations ( demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment !), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
(The FOCUSED SOAP psychiatric evaluation is typically the follow-up visit patient note. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be focusing more on the symptoms from your differential diagnosis from the comprehensive psychiatric evaluation narrowing to your diagnostic impression. You will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)
EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE
Subjective:
CC (chief complaint): A brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.
HPI: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:
N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for medication management follow up for anxiety. He was initiated sertraline last appt which he finds was effective for two weeks then symptoms began to return.
Or
P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for follow up to discuss previous psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications as we deferred until further testing and screening was conducted.
Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.
Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your follow up evaluation? Document symptom onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. What has worsened or improved since last appointment? What stressors are they facing? Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses into your diagnostic impression. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5 diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.
Substance Use History: This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.
Current Medications: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.
Allergies: Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.
Reproductive Hx: Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse: oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns
ROS: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis. Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!
You should list each system as follows: General: Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.
Example of Complete ROS:
GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.
HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.
SKIN: No rash or itching.
CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.
RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.
GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.
GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color
NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.
HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.
LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.
ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.
Objective:
Diagnostic results: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination: For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.
He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking. He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good.
Also included in this section is the reflection. Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?
Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations ( demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Case Formulation and Treatment Plan
Includes documentation of diagnostic studies that will be obtained, referrals to other health care providers, therapeutic interventions including psychotherapy and/or psychopharmacology, education, disposition of the patient, and any planned follow-up visits. Each diagnosis or condition documented in the assessment should be addressed in the plan. The details of the plan should follow an orderly manner. *See an example below. You will modify to your practice so there may be information excluded/included. If you are completing this for a practicum, what does your preceptor document?
Risks and benefits of medications are discussed including non- treatment. Potential side effects of medications discussed (be detailed in what side effects discussed). Informed client not to stop medication abruptly without discussing with providers. Instructed to call and report any adverse reactions. Discussed risk of medication with pregnancy/fetus, encouraged birth control, discussed if does become pregnant to inform provider as soon as possible. Discussed how some medications might decreased birth control pill, would need back up method (exclude for males).
Discussed risks of mixing medications with OTC drugs, herbal, alcohol/illegal drugs. Instructed to avoid this practice. Encouraged abstinence. Discussed how drugs/alcohol affect mental health, physical health, sleep architecture.
Initiation of (list out any medication and why prescribed, any therapy services or referrals to specialist):
Client was encouraged to continue with case management and/or therapy services (if not provided by you)
Client has emergency numbers: Emergency Services 911, the Client's Crisis Line 1-800-_______. Client instructed to go to nearest ER or call 911 if they become actively suicidal and/or homicidal. (only if you or preceptor provided them)
Reviewed hospital records/therapist records for collaborative information; Reviewed PMP report (only if actually completed)
Time allowed for questions and answers provided. Provided supportive listening. Client appeared to understand discussion. Client is amenable with this plan and agrees to follow treatment regimen as discussed. (this relates to informed consent; you will need to assess their understanding and agreement)
Follow up with PCP as needed and/or for:
Labs ordered and/or reviewed (write out what diagnostic test ordered, rationale for ordering, and if discussed fasting/non fasting or other patient education)
Return to clinic:
Continued treatment is medically necessary to address chronic symptoms, improve functioning, and prevent the need for a higher level of care.
References (move to begin on next page)
You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.
© 2022 Walden University Page 1 of 3
CASE STUDY:
The patient is a 34-year-old Hispanic female, who reports having a history of mental illness remarkable for some depression and anxiety over the last 2 years, who came to our clinic voluntarily for follow up after she was discharge from the crisis unit at Palmetto Hospital. Patient was Baker Act and admitted in involuntary status with symptoms of depression and passive death wishes. As per medical records the patient reported that over the last several days, she had been feeling somewhat anxious, sad, depressed, and overwhelmed, complained of having multiple stressors that led her feel overwhelmed and in distress and that most recently she was having perception idea that she was doing something bad against her son such as for example, she was cleaning the dishes and she used to see her of grabbing a knife or a sharp object and hurting him. She stated that, that was a very disturbing idea, very ego-dystonic that she did not want to have, but she was not able to stop thinking about that, even she tried to and because of that, she became depressed, overwhelmed, hopeless, and wanted to hurt herself rather than harming him. She also stated that most recently she became somewhat erratic,disorganized, not able to sleep for several days, having some paranoid ideation and becoming religiously preoccupied. During the initial psychiatric evaluation, patient reported that she had two similar episodes for the first time in her life in 2021, for which reason, she was admitted into the hospital and continue outpatient treatment, but she stated that recently her psychotropic medications were modified and the antipsychotic medication that she was taking was discontinued.
PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:
Evaluated and treated twice during 2021 in the psychiatric facility in Texas, subsequently outpatient followup. Patient and her family moved to Miami in March 2022. Taking medications such as Paxil and an antipsychotic medication that she cannot recall, which was discontinued 2 months ago.
FAMILY HISTORY OF MENTAL ILLNESS:
The patient's maternal aunt suffers from depression.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE HISTORY:
Denied.
PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:
Remarkable for thyroid carcinoma, which was removed.
Respiratory Rate |
18 br/min |
Cuff Location |
Left arm |
Blood Pressure Position |
Sitting |
Peripheral Pulse Rate |
75 bpm |
Systolic Blood Pressure |
121 mmHg |
Diastolic Blood Pressure |
72 mmHg |
Mean Arterial Pressure, Cuff |
88 mmHg |
Temperature Oral |
36.6 DegC LOW |
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:
The patient appears awake, alert, and oriented x3. Dressed casually. Fair hygiene. Fair eye contact. Psychomotor, neutral. Presenting a spontaneous speech, normal rate and volume, relevant, coherent. Mood is anxious, nervous,fearful, sad, and depressed. She complains of feelings of loneliness and apathy. Denies any command hallucination or suicidal thoughts at this moment.Acknowledging having death wishes in the past but not now, somewhat religiously preoccupied, but denies any other delusions or symptoms of psychosis. Intelligence is average. Insight and judgment are adequate. Recent and remote memory is intact.
DIAGNOSIS:
Axis I: Major depressive disorder with psychotic features. Rule out bipolar
disorder.
Assignment 2: Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case Presentation
Psychiatric notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect them to the didactic learning you gain from your NRNP courses. Focused SOAP notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.
For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last three weeks, using the Focused SOAP Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient.
To Prepare
· Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.
· Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
· Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:
· Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
· Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
· Assessment: Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.
· Plan: In your video, describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based practice. Include a discussion on your chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and include alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. All treatment choices must have a discussion of your rationale for the choice supported by valid research. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this treatment session?
· In your written plan include all the above as well as include one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.
· Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow up, discuss what your next intervention would be.
· At least 3 references
· Review the Exemplar and use the template to complete the assignment.

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com