Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| HLT-308V | HLT-308V-O500 | Organizational Risk Management Interview | 150.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) | 4: Good (85.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| % Scaling | 100.0% | |||||||
| Risk Management Strategies Used in the Risk Control Program | 10.0% | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are not included. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | Risk management strategies used in the risk control program are comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| How the Risk Management Program Addresses Key Professional, Legal, and Ethical Issues | 10.0% | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is not included. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is complete. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A description of how the risk management program addresses key professional, legal, and ethical issues is comprehensive, supported by detailed, relevant examples. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| Facility Policies for Managing Emergency Triage in High-Risk Areas of Health Care Service Delivery | 10.0% | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is not included. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An explanation of the facility policies for managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery is present and comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| Challenges the Organization Faces in Managing and Controlling High-Risk Health Care | 10.0% | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is not included. | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk healthcare is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is complete. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A comprehensive description of the challenges the organization faces in managing and controlling high-risk health care is provided. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| Strategies the Facility Utilizes to Monitor and Maintain Its Risk Management Program | 10.0% | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is not included. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is complete. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | A description of the strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| Assessment of the Risk Management Program Inclusive of Health and Legal Concerns | 15.0% | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is not included. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An assessment of the risk management program inclusive of high-risk health care and legal concerns is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| Proposed Action Steps to Improve the Risk Management Program Inclusive of Rationale | 10.0% | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is not included. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is described in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. | An inventory of the proposed action steps to improve the risk management program inclusive of rationale is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. | ||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Informatics Specialists
How does the current health IT structure at your institution support or hinder the effectiveness of informatics specialists in nursing, medicine, and other disciplines?
Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com