Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| MIS-602 | MIS-602-O500 | Information Systems Department Communication | 80.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% | |||||||
| Functions of an IS Department | 15.0% | A description of the functions of an IS department is not present. | A description of the functions of an IS department is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the functions of an IS department is present but done at a minimal level. | A description of the functions of an IS department is clearly provided and well developed. | A description of the functions of an IS department is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Four Department Groups and Their Purposes | 15.0% | A description of the four department groups and their purposes is not present. | A description of the four department groups and their purposes is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the four department groups and their purposes is present but done at a minimal level. | A description of the four department groups and their purposes is clearly provided and well developed. | A description of the four department groups and their purposes is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Major Role Each Department Plays With IS | 15.0% | A description of the major role each department plays with IS is not present. | A description of the major role each department plays with IS is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the major role each department plays with IS is present but done at a minimal level. | A description of the major role each department plays with IS is clearly provided and well developed. | A description of the major role each department plays with IS is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Each of the Planning Functions | 10.0% | A description of the each of the planning functions is not present. | A description of the each of the planning functions is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the each of the planning functions is present but done at a minimal level. | A description of the each of the planning functions is clearly provided and well developed. | A description of the each of the planning functions is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Importance of Information Systems Management | 10.0% | A description of the importance of information systems management is not present. | A description of the importance of information systems management is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the importance of information systems management is present but done at a minimal level. | A description of the importance of information systems management is clearly provided and well developed. | A description of the importance of information systems management is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Presenter Notes for Each Slide With Talking Points, Including Details to Be Discussed During the Presentation | 5.0% | Presenter notes for each slide with talking points, including details to be discussed during the presentation, are not present. | Presenter notes for each slide with talking points, including details to be discussed during the presentation, are present but lack detail or are incomplete. | Presenter notes for each slide with talking points, including details to be discussed during the presentation, are present but done at a minimal level. | Presenter notes for each slide with talking points, including details to be discussed during the presentation, are clearly provided and well developed. | Presenter notes for each slide with talking points, including details to be discussed during the presentation, are thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | |||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Format | 10.0% | |||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com