EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx by Busola Omolayole
Submission date: 12-Mar-2020 05:55PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1274576926 File name: EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx (14.89K) Word count: 565 Character count: 3154
1
Grammar, punctuation, sentence structure
Supporting reference needed
2
Supporting reference needed
3
Supporting reference needed
Less than 6
Supporting reference needed
Supporting reference needed
4
22% SIMILARITY INDEX
18% INTERNET SOURCES
11% PUBLICATIONS
23% STUDENT PAPERS
1 7% 2 6% 3 5% 4 3% 5 1%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
umb.libguides.com Internet Source
Submitted to Western Governors University Student Paper
Submitted to University of Hertfordshire Student Paper
Submitted to Saint Leo University Student Paper
Submitted to Florida Gulf Coast University Student Paper
QM
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
/100
EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
Comment 1
Use APA headings:
Headings http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/other/headinglevels
Grammar, punctuation, sentence structure
Check grammar, punctuation and sentence structure
Supporting reference needed
Supporting reference is needed- APA
Additional Comment
Do you mean hospital administration?
Comment 2
What technique are you referring to? Not clear
Supporting reference needed
Supporting reference is needed- APA
Comment 3
Be more specific about the time required
QM
QM
QM
QM
Be more specific about the time required
Supporting reference needed
Supporting reference is needed- APA
Less than 6
When there are less than 6 authors, list all authors the first time cited- APA
PAGE 3
Supporting reference needed
Supporting reference is needed- APA
Supporting reference needed
Supporting reference is needed- APA
Additional Comment
These statements need to be supported with reference(s)
Comment 4
How about hand washing? You need to compare hand washing to alcohol based gels and cite supporting references for the differences
PAGE 4
- EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx
- by Busola Omolayole
- EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx
- ORIGINALITY REPORT
- PRIMARY SOURCES
- EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx
- GRADEMARK REPORT
- FINAL GRADE
- GENERAL COMMENTS
- Instructor
Submission author: Assignment title: Submission title:
File name: File size:
Page count: Word count:
Character count: Submission date:
Submission ID:
Digital Receipt This receipt acknowledges that Turnitin received your paper. Below you will find the receipt information regarding your submission.
The first page of your submissions is displayed below.
Busola Omolayole EB004 Assessment Submission (Att… EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx EB004_EBP_B_Omolayole.docx 14.89K 4 565 3,154 12-Mar-2020 05:55PM (UTC-0400) 1274576926
Copyright 2020 Turnitin. All rights reserved.
- Digital Receipt
Critical Appraisal Worksheet
Evaluation Table
Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Full APA formatted citation of selected article. |
Article #1 |
Article #2 |
Article #3 |
Article #4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence Level * (I, II, or III)
|
|
|
|
|
Conceptual Framework
Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**
|
|
|
|
|
Design/Method
Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria). |
|
|
|
|
Sample/Setting
The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Major Variables Studied
List and define dependent and independent variables |
|
|
|
|
Measurement
Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (You need to list the actual tests done). |
|
|
|
|
Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative findings
(You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data). |
|
|
|
|
Findings and Recommendations
General findings and recommendations of the research |
|
|
|
|
Appraisal and Study Quality
Describe the general worth of this research to practice.
What are the strengths and limitations of study?
What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research?
What is the feasibility of use in your practice? |
|
|
|
|
Key findings
|
|
|
|
|
Outcomes
|
|
|
|
|
General Notes/Comments |
|
|
|
|
· Level I
Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis
· Level II
Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis
· Level III
Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis
· Level IV
Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence
· Level V
Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence
**Note on Conceptual Framework
· The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework
· Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework.
· As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.”
· Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature.
· Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two.
References
The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University (n.d.). Johns Hopkins nursing dvidence-based practice: appendix C: evidence level and quality guide. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_c_evidence_level_quality_guide.pdf
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your" House". Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.
Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework
© 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 2