EB001: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim: Analyze the relationship between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim in healthcare organizations.
Written Response Submission Form
Your Name: First and last
Your E-Mail Address: Your email here
Instructions
Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim.
Write your responses where it reads “Enter your response here.” Write as much, as needed, to satisfy the requirements indicated. Each item contains the Rubric, which will be used to evaluate your responses.
Item 1
· Define the Quadruple Aim and explain its application to evidence-based practice.
· Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:
· Patient experience (2–3 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
Item 2
· Population health (2–3 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
0 Not Present |
1 Needs Improvement |
2 Meets Expectations |
Module 1: Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) |
|||
· Population health
Learning Objective 1.2 – Analyze how evidence-based practice supports population health |
Response is missing. |
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to population health.
The response includes inaccurate or vague examples of how evidence-based practice impacts population health.
The response minimally synthesizes and integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
|
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to population health.
The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts population health.
The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.
|
Item 3
· Costs (2–3 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
0 Not Present |
1 Needs Improvement |
2 Meets Expectations |
Module 2: The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice |
|||
· Costs
Learning Objective 2.1 – Analyze how evidence-based practice supports cost considerations in support of the Quadruple Aim in healthcare |
Response is missing. |
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to costs in healthcare.
The response includes inaccurate or vague examples of how evidence-based practice impacts costs in healthcare.
The response minimally synthesizes and integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
|
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to costs in healthcare.
The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts costs in healthcare.
The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.
|
Item 4
· Work-life of healthcare providers (2–3 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
0 Not Present |
1 Needs Improvement |
2 Meets Expectations |
Module 2: The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice |
|||
· Work-life of healthcare providers
Learning Objective 2.1 – Analyze how evidence-based practice supports work-life of healthcare providers |
Response is missing. |
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to work-life of healthcare providers.
The response includes inaccurate or vague examples of how evidence-based practice impacts work-life of healthcare providers.
The response minimally synthesizes and integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
|
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to work-life of healthcare providers.
The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts work-life of healthcare providers.
The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.
|
References
Provide a citation for each resource you used to write your response to this Assessment. The following citation has been provided as an example:
· Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Mastery Rubric
In order to achieve mastery of this Competency, you must achieve a “2” on every rubric row in addition to meeting the additional expectation indicated in the Mastery Rubric.
Professional Skill Building
The faculty Assessor will provide feedback based on the following Professional Skill(s): Written Communication, Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, and Information Literacy. Although the feedback is here to inform the development of your skills, it is not a barrier to achieving the Competency, unless the writing is too poor to be able to score the content of the Assessment. Review the rubric and check your work based on the learning objectives listed. If you are concerned that your writing will not meet these expectations yet, reach out to your Faculty Subject Matter Expert (SME) so he or she can work with you to further develop this important professional skill.
It is highly recommended that you use this opportunity to practice these important skills in the context of this Competency Assessment in order to receive feedback about your current level of proficiency.
|
|||||||
Professional Skills Building |
0 Not Present |
1 Needs Improvement |
2 Meets Expectations |
||||
PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills. |
|||||||
Learning Objective PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.
|
Multiple major and minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are highly distracting and seriously impact readability. |
Multiple minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are distracting and negatively impact readability. |
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
|
||||
Learning Objective PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.
|
Writing is poorly organized and incoherent. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are missing or inappropriate. |
Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity. |
Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.
|
||||
Learning Objective PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work. |
APA conventions are not applied. |
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently. |
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.
|
||||
Learning Objective PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.
|
Vocabulary and tone are inappropriate and negatively impact clarity of concepts to be conveyed. |
Vocabulary and tone have limited relevance to the audience. |
Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts. |
||||
PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional issues and inform best practice. |
|||||||
|
0 Not Present |
1 Needs Improvement |
2 Meets Expectations |
||||
Learning Objective PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions. |
Assumptions are missing. |
Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument.
|
Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.
|
||||
Learning Objective PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives. |
Assessment of multiple perspectives is missing. |
Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives. |
Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives. |
||||
PS006: Information Literacy: Apply appropriate strategies to identify relevant and credible information and data in order to effectively analyze issues and make decisions. |
|||||||
Learning Objective PS 6.1: Identify credible sources. |
Credible sources are missing. |
Some sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic. |
Most sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic. |
||||
Learning Objective PS 6.2: Analyze findings from relevant sources. |
Analysis is missing. |
Analysis superficially reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose. |
Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose. |
© 2020 Walden University 7