Running head: PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN 1
PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN 10
Program Evaluation Plan
Name:
Tanisha Hannah
Institution:
Strayer University
Professor:
Dr. Jacob
Course:
Edu 571
Date:
Program Evaluation Plan (Part 3)
Goals of Evaluation
Evaluation refers to the act of checking various things thoroughly in order to characterize their worth or value, with reference to a certain context. In the field of education, the amount of success in a person’s aims can only be determined through evaluation. Therefore, there is a very close relationship between various aims and evaluation. The main goals of evaluation in schools are as discussed below. The first goal of evaluation in the field of education is to create an educational program ("Evaluation in Teaching and Learning Process | Education", 2020). Through evaluation, evaluators and the school management can build a given program of learning among the students. This is after gathering and checking various factors in order to find what program will fit and make a positive impact in the school. This involves consulting all the stakeholders of the program and developing strategies that will ensure the development of a good program.
The second goal of evaluation is assessing the effectiveness of the program. Evaluation ensures that the developed program is up to standards and serves the purpose that it was intended to. It helps the evaluators to check if the teaching strategies and techniques are being applied properly. The third goal of evaluation is to ensure improvement of the program. Through evaluation, evaluators can gauge the impact of the program on the school and learners. They can also identify various things that can make the program more effective. It acts as an in-built monitor in the program in order to review the progress of the program from time to time. It also gives feedback regarding the design and the implementation of a given program. Through such assessments, the school management can know where to work on, and what they need in order to enhance effective programs in teaching and learning.
For instance, in our case, evaluators can comfortably tell whether or not the program is helping girls become more superior in math. If not they can suggest better or other strategies that will make positive impact.
Cultural Issues Affecting the Program
Culture can influence how different people view things. An individual’s culture and upbringing can affect their way of processing information. Among the cultural issues that might be faced in the evaluation plan include cultural stereotypes. Some students believe that they cannot perform as expected in school or in a particular subject due to lack of preparation from their home environment. This makes them believe they do not have enough potential to do well in a given subject when they get to school. For instance, some students may not have calculators and revision materials for mathematics at home. This makes them poor in calculations and solving complex problems due to poor practice (Gelb, 2020). As a result, some students get to school lacking various basics and lag behind due to deficiencies in their homes. This also makes them to have shortcomings in knowledge and skills that lead to poor performances. However, this can be corrected by using time wisely while in school and utilizing the resources in the school premises properly to improve their skills by doing regular practice.
Another cultural issue is assumption and poor treatment of learners by teachers. Some teachers expect very less from learners from specific cultural backgrounds. When teachers have the mentality of students performing poorly for whatever reason, their teaching approaches align with their low expectation levels. This may affect the program negatively because no matter how much girls try to improve in math, their teachers have already formed a negative perspective. The teachers may not find it important to motivate the students to do well in math because they do not believe they have that potential.
This can be solved by helping teachers and students change mentalities that have been developed and associated with their cultures. Different people have different capabilities and can handle things their own way if properly directed.
Another issue that may affect the evaluation program is cultural differences between students. Some students believe that only people from a certain background can perform better in a certain subject. People from various cultural traditions may have different education approaches that differ from the approaches in American schools ("Current Issues in Education", 2020). It is important for the teachers to note such things and encourage students to work hard in all areas despite their differences in cultural beliefs. Students should not feel inferior because of being associated with various cultures. They should acknowledge they have what it takes and the ability to perform better in all areas. Teachers should understand the cultures of every student, and their students at an individual level. Teachers should treat all students the same despite their gender, racial or cultural backgrounds, and have high expectations for everyone in order to enable them to strive and reach their full potential.
Data Analysis and Assessment
The evaluation plan will be carried out using stratified random sampling. This sampling technique involves diving the study population into meaningful similar groups based on a specific characteristic called strata. Thereafter, a random sample is selected from every group. This type of sampling ensures proper representativeness on a trait of interest in the population. Through this sampling method, a wider range of population can be well studied without a large sample size.
The evaluation plan will use three methods of assessment which are formative, summative and process assessment. We will begin the program with process assessment. Process assessment identifies the milestone of the project, activities to be done, products to be expected, and the costs that are likely to be incurred in order to achieve the goals. Formative assessment is whereby the results are used to form and revise the process of an education plan. In case the plan needs any improvement or ways of strengthening it, formative assessment will help us identify that. Summative assessment helps in documenting outcomes and value judgment. Through summative assessment, we will have the necessary feedback about the quality of the plan. The initiation and implementation of the program will take three to four weeks. Evaluation will begin after three to four months through data collection and proper assessment.
Tasks, Costs Personnel, and Questions Involved in the Plan
TASKS |
COSTS |
QUESTIONS FOR THE INTERVIEW |
PERSONNEL |
|
· Data analysis costs |
· What were the former grades for the selected population? |
· Teachers |
· Data Analysis |
· Salaries for the Evaluators |
· What were the expected grades? |
· Evaluators |
· Presentation of the outcome |
· Transportation costs |
· What did you achieve? |
· Students |
|
|
· How was it competing with boys for the first time? |
|
|
|
· Did the program motivate you? |
|
|
|
· Do you have a different perspective on Math after the program? |
|
Evaluation Timeline
Project Goal |
Activity |
Activity |
Expected Completion Date |
Continue conducting process evaluation for the program on gender equity for girls in Math |
Monitoring the operations of the evaluation program |
Conduct visits to review program operations |
May-20 |
Continue conducting evaluation of the outcome |
Complete data collection for the group under study |
work with the female students for the program success |
May-20 |
|
Finalize collecting data procedures for the control group |
collect data on culture and personal perspectives |
Jun-20 |
|
Access the information sources for data collection follow up on the measures of outcome for the experimental groups |
Extract data |
Jun-20 |
|
Sample case tracking and interviewing |
Extract data |
Jul-20 |
|
Build and implement data analysis and reporting initial plans |
Conduct data analysis and reports |
Jul-20 |
Release the final outcome |
Give a final report about the program |
Organize the reports for final presentation |
Aug-20 |
Expected Costs
The expected costs for the project include:
$ 20,000 for data collection
$ 10,000 for data analysis
$ 50,000 for paying evaluators
$ 30, 000 for transport
$ 10,000 miscellaneous
The total cost of the plan will be $ 120, 000.
Cost benefit analysis is a method used in comparing the total costs of a program with its benefits ("Cost Benefit Analysis: An Expert Guide | Smartsheet", 2020). It helps in the calculation of the benefit associated with the program. In this case, we might not be able to account for the benefit in terms of cash because the entire program is based on services. However, there will be cost reduction methods through assistance given by the teachers and the study population. The school will highly benefit from the program by acknowledging the importance of gender equity for girls in Math. They will realize the potential that girls have with regards to Math subject. This will help them improve their performance and start empowering fair competition among the learners.
References
Cost Benefit Analysis: An Expert Guide | Smartsheet. (2020). Retrieved 20 February 2020, from https://www.smartsheet.com/expert-guide-cost-benefit-analysis
Current Issues in Education. (2020). Retrieved 20 February 2020, from https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/sociology/education/current-issues-in-education
Evaluation in Teaching and Learning Process | Education. (2020). Retrieved 20 February 2020, from http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/statistics-2/evaluation-in-teaching-and-learning-process-education/92476
Gelb, C. (2020). Cultural Issues in the Higher Education Classroom. Retrieved 20 February 2020, from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/661/cultural-issues-in-the-higher-education-classroom
Running Head: DATA COLLECTION 1
DATA COLLECTION 7
Student Name:
Tanisha Hannah
Institution Affiliation:
Strayer University
Course:
Edu 571
Date:
March 8, 2020
Data collection is the process of gathering information that is relevant to act as evidence on a research project. People use diverse sources so that they can get enough data concerning their research to act as authentic and reliable data for them. There are different forms of data collection that a researcher might implement for their research topic. This paper will focus on discussing three sources that will be expected to be used during the evaluation process, seven open-minded interview queries to present to the target population, the issues that might be encountered in data collection and recommendation on how to maintain effective communication skills.
The evaluation process for “gender equity for girls in math” will depend on three different data sources that incorporate the primary, secondary and tertiary sources. Primary sources are the documents, diary or other initial sources of information that is created as well as serves as the original source of data for the research topic (Schindler, 2019). Primary sources of data are important and rely on the survey mechanism to gather information. In this research, the primary source of data will comprise of interviews using emails, telephones as well as face to face communication, designed questionnaires, statistical decretive writings, eyewitness accounts and legal documents. All this kind of primary data are necessary in the evaluation procedure of the research program.
The secondary sources that will be used incorporate the program records, data collected from other researches and government databases. The secondary sources depend on the data that is already existing and has already been gathered and supports the primary data. On the other hand, the tertiary sources of information are mostly utilized in the evaluation process because it offers information on the research topic. The tertiary sources include textbooks, encyclopedia, dictionaries and handbooks. These three sources of data are the best sources and main sources to include in a research to ensure that a research meets the requirements of a research paper. These three sources will offer information on gender equality when it comes to math for the girls/females.
The research will also incorporate some open-ended interview question that will help in acquiring more information concerning the program “gender equity for girls in math.” Through utilization of interviews, I believe that there will be an in-depth understanding of this issue as it has been an issue of concern for a long period of time (Schindler, 2019). The use of interview will assist in the process of evaluation. The questions are formulated based on the programs need to collect relevant information from diverse individuals. The following interview question will be addressed:
1. What is the meaning “gender equity for girls in math”?
2. How are these programs useful in schools?
3. How can this program be implemented in most of our schools?
4. What are the pitfalls of this program?
5. How do most of the institution perceive this program?
6. What should be done to advance this program?
7. What methods can be used to implement “gender equity for girls in math”?
These question are important for one to realize the importance of this program in our current curriculum or in our institution. “Gender equity for girls in math” is an issue that need to be addressed and the program is the best for ensuring that it has been upheld. Not until schools understand the important of this issue being addressed so that girls might feel comfortable and change their perception about mathematics.
In the process of gathering data through collecting, compiling, interpreting, and reporting the data, one might face various challenges. “Schindler (2019) affirms that the population may fail to participate in the questionnaire and fail to respond to the questions in truth.” One of the reason why people might respond with untrue information in the questionnaire is when they feel that the question being act affect their personal lives. Due to gender biasness people might also fail to participate on the questionnaire or offer biased information regarding the questions presented. Men do not like feeling inferior and if they do not view thing with an open mind they fail to offer true information.
There is also an issue when compiling data; one might face some difficulty when the information offered is not enough or might not meet the scope of discussion which might mean the information is not reliable (Mertler, 2016). During the process of interpreting data, there might be misunderstanding regarding what information is true and what data to rely on. When reporting data the information might be unreliable and the information presented might be inaccurate. So many challenges that an individual might face during the research, which might make the information irrelevant or inaccurate (Quinlan et al, 2019).
Stakeholders participate in a relevant role in the process of program evaluation through making the necessary contribution that facilitate the process. In the process of gathering and reporting data, it is important to communicate with the stakeholders. “Shamseer (2015) confirms that reports can also be presented through visual and oral form through news, presentations, posters, and exhibit. These two methods are useful in providing reports for the process. Even more, a combination of both written and visual reports is essential and will help provide sufficient information about the process (Bryman, 2016)” These individuals need to be educated on what is going on, incorporating sources of information and the methods of collecting data. The education regarding data collection will create a deeper understanding of the procedure for collection data which the stakeholder can be incorporates in the process of decision making. Stakeholders need to be in the meetings as well ensure that they comprehend the things happening and let them participate in discussions (Bell & Harley, 2018). “Apart from that, it is vital to promote transparency by providing regular updates to shareholders and don’t assume that communication is fluid. This will help reduce friction in the organization and strengthen the relationship with stakeholders. Shamseer (2015)”
Conclusion
There are different forms of data collection that a researcher might implement for their research topic. The evaluation process for “gender equity for girls in math” will depend on three different data sources that incorporate the primary, secondary and tertiary sources. There is also an issue when compiling data; one might face some difficulty when the information offered is not enough or might not meet the scope of discussion which might mean the information is not reliable. . Due to gender biasness people might also fail to participate on the questionnaire or offer biased information regarding the questions presented. Stakeholders participate in a relevant role in the process of program evaluation through making the necessary contribution that facilitate the process. In the process of gathering and reporting data, it is important to communicate with the stakeholders.
References
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business research methods. Oxford university press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=J9J2DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=research+methods&ots=GLhxgiaVHK&sig=niAHRKqByydlPm9U-nTrddGXjck
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=N2zQCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=research+methods&ots=doQuFYN9uc&sig=7uoYc3Ycbyf15xNuPRx4sRlxtjc
Ghauri, P., Grønhaug, K., & Strange, R. (2020). Research methods in business studies. Cambridge University Press.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications Limited.
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2017). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage publications.
Mertler, C. A., (2016). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. Sage Publications.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., &Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
Quinlan, C., Babin, B., Carr, J., & Griffin, M. (2019). Business research methods. South Western Cengage. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=sPJFDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT20&dq=research+methods&ots=wloptEVyG2&sig=WLeGnkcwc6LsYbDjRKWMrksS80k
Schindler III, A. R. (2019). System and method for managing sample collection data and documentation. U.S. Patent Application No. 10/198,676.
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com