Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| HCA-530 | HCA-530-O500 | Benchmark - Capital Needs Essay | 100.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% | |||||||
| In an essay (1,000-1,250 words) address the following prompts, citing four to six scholarly sources to support your claims: Explain the difference between the two and which financing would be appropriate and why, considering that this is a private, not-for-profit hospital. (C: 3.6) | 30.0% | Essay fails to explain the difference between equity or debt financing and which financing would be appropriate considering that this is a private, not-for-profit hospital. | Essay explains the difference between equity or debt financing and which financing would be appropriate considering that this is a private, not-for-profit hospital in a less than satisfactory way. Explanation is vague, illogical, and lacks relevant evidence to support claims. | Essay explains the difference between equity or debt financing and which financing would be appropriate considering that this is a private, not-for-profit hospital in a basic way, but some reasoning doesn’t make sense. Some relevant evidence is provided. | Essay adequately explains the difference between equity or debt financing and which financing would be appropriate considering that this is a private, not-for-profit hospital using sound reasoning supported by some relevant evidence. | Essay thoroughly explains the difference between equity or debt financing and which financing would be appropriate considering that this is a private, not-for-profit hospital, using logical reasoning and strong details supported by relevant evidence. | ||
| Explain the term working capital and how it is related to debt financing for capital expenditures. | 20.0% | Essay fails to explain the term working capital and how it is related to debt financing for capital expenditures | Essay explains the term working capital and how it is related to debt financing for capital expenditures in a less than satisfactory way. Explanation is vague, inaccurate, or lacks relevant evidence to support claims. Reasoning doesn’t flow logically. | Essay explains the term working capital and how it is related to debt financing for capital expenditures in a basic way, supported with some relevant evidence to support claims, but some reasoning doesn’t make sense. | Essay adequately explains the term working capital and how it is related to debt financing for capital expenditures using reasoning supported with strong relevant evidence to support claims. | Essay thoroughly explains the term working capital and how it is related to debt financing for capital expenditures using strong logical reasoning supported with relevant evidence to support claims. | ||
| Discuss the importance of a cash budget and how it can be used to assess the financial viability of this capital expenditure. | 20.0% | Essay fails to discuss the importance of a cash budget and how it can be used to assess the financial viability of this capital expenditure | Essay discusses the importance of a cash budget in a less than satisfactory way and fails to address how it can be used to assess the financial viability of this capital expenditure Lacks relevant evidence. Reasoning doesn’t flow logically. | Essay discusses the importance of a cash budget and explains how it can be used to assess the financial viability of this capital expenditure on a basic level, some reasoning doesn’t make sense. Lacks some relevant evidence. | Essay adequately discusses the importance of a cash budget and explains how it can be used to assess the financial viability of this capital expenditure, using logical reasoning supported with some relevant evidence. | Essay thoroughly discusses the importance of a cash budget and comprehensively explains how it can be used to assess the financial viability of this capital expenditure, using logical reasoning supported with relevant evidence. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | |||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Format | 10.0% | |||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com