Rubic_Print_FormatCourse_CodeClass_CodeAssignment_TitleTotal

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCA-515	HCA-515-O500	Collaborative Team-Based Health Care Delivery Paper	130.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Patient Case	5.0%	A description of the patient case is not present.	N/A	N/A	N/A	A description of the patient case is present.
Collaborative Team	15.0%	A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is incomplete.	A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is complete.	A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the collaborative team that would deliver care, including individual roles, credentialing, licensing, and regulation, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Indicators and Determinants of Health	10.0%	A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is incomplete.	A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is complete but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of indicators and determinants of health that influence the case is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Management and Line Staff	10.0%	A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is incomplete.	A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is complete but lacks supporting details.	A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the impact of the collaborative team approach on management and line staff is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Financial and Resource Challenges	15.0%	An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is incomplete.	An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is complete but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the key financial and resource challenges, including the effect these have on the team, is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Advantages	15.0%	A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is incomplete.	A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is complete but lacks supporting details.	A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the advantages of using the collaborative team-based approach is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Surname 1

Student Name

Instructor

Course Name and Code

Date

Outline: Racist Speech as the Functional Equivalent of Fighting Words

Thesis: Face to face insults which carry racially discriminatory elements should not get First Amendment protection due to the effects that they cause.

Reasons why face to face racial insults should not be protected under the First Amendment

i. Such insults have an immediate negative impact on the victim which may be regarded as injury

ii. The First Amendment promotes free speech but face to face racial insults tend to curtail more speech and therefore should not be encouraged.

· Racial insults mostly make the victim speechless and this creates a moment of personal embarrassment with the victim feeling inferior and overwhelmed by fear.

· In other cases the victim may decide to confront the racist and this is most likely to cause a breech in peaceful coexistence.

How racial insults differ with protected speech

· Racial insults lead to emotional and reputational injury which is likely to inhibit the ability to provide a sound response while protected speech does not.

· Racial insults are directed to minority in most cases and mostly demean the victim making them more powerless while free speech does not.

· Racial insults are fighting words because they cause immediate injury to those targeted at.

· Racial insults cause shock, plight and inability to face the moment or the perpetrator and therefore cannot be classified as free speech.

· Racial insults apart from causing instant injury also lead to disorientation of the victim distracting them from normal activities like work or school and majorly threatening their peaceful existence.

Conclusion

Racial insults should not be protected under the First Amendment because they fight against the same efforts that the First Amendment promotes and they cause immediate reputational injury to the victim curtailing more speech.

blog4

Rubic_Print_Format

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.