Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ESL-533 ESL-533-O502 Evaluating and Selecting Assessments 65.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Category 100.0%
Summary of Article: Analyzes items from the assigned article. Presents them with brief summary to provide context for the reader. 25.0% Not addressed. Summary fails to paint a clear picture of the article, omits major elements, and is disorganized. Summarizes the primary elements and key points of the article; however, summary is cursory and lacks depth. Summary of the article is clearly evident to the reader. Themes and details are present and easily identified. Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail.
Analysis: Two items from article adequately described and the importance of each justified. 35.0% Not addressed. An analysis of one or both of the items presented without specific details direction or emphasis. Project presents weak, marginal evidence and/or exhibits large gaps in the presentation of evidence, resulting from inconsistent connections with the argument. An analysis of both of the items is broadly listed, but not specifically or in detail. Evidence, such as textual sources, personal experience, and observation is appropriate to the audience and rhetorical situation. The evidence fulfills the minimum in terms of quantity and quality that is acceptable to support the argument. An analysis of both of the items is outlined. A diversity of evidence is present. The evidence extends beyond what is needed to support the argument effectively. An analysis of both of the items is described in detail and in depth. Presents a compelling argument for inclusion of the resource in the project. The type, quantity, and/or quality of evidence resonate with the claims, argument, and structure of the paper. Irrefutable evidence from theoretical, academic, and practical sources is convincingly presented.
Topic Knowledge 10.0% Not addressed. Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
Content Cohesiveness 10.0% Not addressed. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. The essay is generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The presentation gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Conclusion 5.0% Not addressed. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but it is vague or poorly developed. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but is cursory and lacking depth. Summary of the paper is evident to the reader. Arguments presented follow logical progression and support claims. Summary of paper is clearly evident to the reader. Arguments support all claims with clarity, order, and richness of detail.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized. Prose is completely free of mechanical errors. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized. Writing is engaging and practice related language is utilized.
APA Format and Style Requirements 5.0% Not addressed. References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used. References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.
Total Weightage 100%

1

Valuation Methods

Valuation Methodology

• There are numerous ways to value a company quantitatively and no one method is superior to all others

• Valuation is part science and part “gut”

• 3 categories: – Asset-based: rarely used now as mfg. shifts out of

the U.S.

– Cash flow capitalization, and

– Multiples, widely used for entrepreneurial co’s.

2

Multiples

• Cash flow multiples – EBITDA X (3 to 10)

– Adjusted up and down for contextual factors.

– May adjust EBITDA for founder salaries.

• Free cash flow multiples. – EBITDA – CAPEX

– Yields more conservative valuation

– Used when company requires major CAPEX to sustain growth

Multiples

• Sales multiples – Widely used, varies by industry

– Food industry = 1 to 2 X revenues

– Professional services = 1 to 3 X revenues

– Software companies = 2 to 3 X revenues

• P/E ratio method – For publicly traded companies

– Private companies can be based on “comps”

3

Free Cash Flow

• Most complicated and involved – AKA Discounted Cash Flow model

• Relies on many projections and assumptions

• Simply stated, projected future cash flows (generally 5 years), adjusted for taxes, depreciation, working capital and CAPEX, are discounted to PV using the weighted average cost of capital of the company PLUS residual value

Free Cash Flow Formula • Year 1 FCF/(1+DR)+Year 2 FCF/(1+DR)^2 +Year 3

FCF/(1+DR)^3 . . . + RV

• Many criticize model due to its complexity and uncertainties

• Bill Sutter (venture capitalist and Stanford Business School grad) says “I have not used any models since business school – valuation is remarkably unscientific”

4

Valuing Technology/Internet Companies

• Valuation methods discussed thus far are not applicable for valuing tech companies

• Early companies like Netscape, Yahoo, and Amazon.com all went public with little to no revenues at very high valuations

• Current models now focus on users and ultimate revenues attached thereto

• Ultimately, financial fundamentals count

Summary

• Many valuation methods, none of which is particularly better than others

• Valuation, particularly for early stage companies, is highly subjective

• Valuation is “educated speculation”

• Internet/tech companies don’t fit traditional models

1

Key Factors Influencing Valuation

Valuation Process • Valuation is not solely quantitative

• Qualitative factors also come into play

• A “contextual factor analysis”, which describes in what context a valuation is taking place, is needed to properly value a company

• Contextual factors include cash flow (current and historical), who’s involved, availability of capital, and the team

– Many other factors

2

Contextual Factors

• Cash flow – historical, present, future – Current cash flow is most important

– Future cash flow is unknown and primarily the result of efforts of the new owner

– Amount of debt the cash flow can service

• Who’s doing the valuation? – If VC, wants to keep value low

– If entrepreneur, wants to push number up

Contextual Factors

• Public or private? – Public companies are valued higher due to

liquidity in the market and better information

– Private companies lack liquidity and provide limited information

• Availability of capital. – The greater capital available, the higher the

valuations

– Supply vs. demand – greater capital chasing, fixed number of opportunities will compete

3

Contextual Factors

• Is it a strategic or financial buyer? – Generally, strategic buyers value companies

higher than financial buyers

– Availability of capital for private equity funds may swing the pendulum

• Speculation – Value based on projected future performance can

drive valuations up

– “Hype vs. Hope”

Contextual Factors • Company stage

– Early stage = lower valuation

– Less risk with later-stage companies

– Best advice, develop product and market traction as long as possible before seeking outside capital

• Auction – Buyers bidding on company drives valuation

– MSFT outbid Google/Yahoo for 1.6% of Facebook @ $240 million

• Valuation $15 billion! 300 X revenue multiple!

4

Contextual Factors

• Economic conditions – Valuations increased 5 consecutive years to 2000

– Coincided with sustained U.S. economic growth

• Reason for selling – Personal or business pressures?

– Settle estate, owner death, etc.

• Tangible/intangible assets – Mfg. companies – tangible assets

– Technology companies – intangibles

Contextual Factors

• Industry – Similar companies in different industries can have

significantly differing valuations

– Internet/e-commerce vs. the field

• Quality of management team – Startup experience valued in early stage

companies

– If existing team is viewed as weak, valuation can be lower

5

Summary

• Valuations of companies, particularly early stage valuations, are highly subjective

• Valuations are both quantitative and qualitative

• Contextual factors play a large role

1

Valuation Basics

The Ambiguity of Valuation

• Valuation is not solely quantitative

• Entrepreneurs must learn valuation methods but be comfortable with ambiguity

• Valuation is “an illusion”, set more by market factors than by formulas

• What’s the price of your company?

• What someone is willing to pay for it?

2

A Willing Buyer and Willing Seller

• Apple Computer and Be, Inc.

• Apple (Amelio) approached Be to acquire it

• Be had revenues of $3 million and 40 employees (financed with $20 million of venture money)

• Apple - $100 MM; Be’s counter - $250 MM.

• Never came to terms; Apple acquire NeXt

• 5 years later, Be acquired for $11 MM

Subjective Factors in Valuation

• Stage of business

• Management team

• Industry (or market)

• Reason for acquisition or sale

• Other factors

• Ultimately, cash flows drive valuation

3

Pre-money and Post-money Values • Pre-money is the value placed on the company

prior to the investment

• Post-money is the value after the investment – Computed as pre-money + amount invested

• Post-money determines how much the investor owns (or the entrepreneur has given up) as a result of the investment

• Post-money is often pre-money of the next round

Why Value Your Company?

• To determine its selling price

• To determine how much to give up for partnering

• To determine how much to give up for an investment

4

How Much Equity Should You Give Up? • Many entrepreneurs ‘unknowingly’ establish their

company’s value – I want to raise $100,000.

– I want to maintain ownership of 90%

– Implied post-money valuation is $1,000,000 • Entrepreneur retains 90%

• A $100,000 investor gets 10%

• $100,000 ÷ $1,000,000 = 10%

• Sophisticated investors may not agree on equity split or valuation

Summary

• Valuations of companies, particularly early stage companies, is highly subjective

• It’s a negotiation process

• Understanding of terms is essential

• Other factors have big impact on ultimate valuation

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.

Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com