Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| EDU-548 | EDU-548-O500 | Formative and Summative Assessments | 100.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 90.0% | |||||||
| Competencies | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Less than two programmatic competencies are listed. Of the programmatic competencies listed, they are not clearly aligned to the summative assessment. | The two to three programmatic competencies are aligned to the summative assessment. | The two to three programmatic competencies are clearly, and appropriately aligned to the summative assessment. Achievement of the assessment would be equivalent to achievement of the competencies. | The two to three programmatic competencies are thoughtfully, clearly, and appropriately aligned to the summative assessment. Achievement of the assessment would be equivalent to achievement of the competencies. | ||
| Summative Assessment | 30.0% | Not addressed. | The summative assessment is not fully developed or not appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | The summative assessment is fully developed. The assessment is appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | The summative assessment is thoughtful, and fully developed. The assessment is appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | The summative assessment is innovative, thoughtful, and fully developed. The assessment is appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | ||
| Objectives | 15.0% | Not addressed. | The one or two objectives are present but not clearly aligned to the formative assessments. | The one or two objectives are appropriately aligned to the formative assessments. Achievement of the assessments would be equivalent to achievement of the objectives. | The one or two objectives are clearly and appropriately aligned to the formative assessments. Achievement of the assessments would be equivalent to achievement of the objectives. | The one or two objectives are thoughtfully, clearly, and appropriately aligned to the formative assessments. Achievement of the assessments would be equivalent to achievement of the objectives. | ||
| Formative Assessments | 30.0% | Not addressed. | One formative assessment is missing. Of the formative assessments present they are not fully developed or are not appropriate for adult learners. | Both formative assessments are fully developed. The assessments are appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | Both formative assessments are thoughtful, and fully developed. The assessments are appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | Both formative assessments are innovative, thoughtful, and fully developed. The assessments are appropriate for adult learners in a post-secondary course. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% | |||||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Assignment Details (Managerial Approach) Discussion – 300 or more words (Due 12-15-2020) This assignment has 4 parts.
1. Collaboration in a business environment is a best practice that leverages the collective knowledge of the team assembled. Peer evaluation and support, provided in the spirit of continuous improvement and organizational success, result in higher quality deliverables than generally possible by the efforts of an individual. Please describe the process you plan to use to conduct research, identify findings, and develop the Comprehensive Project due in Unit 5 and present a preliminary outline indicating how you intend to organize the project deliverable.
2. Please review the process and outlines of other students, providing an objective assessment and constructive feedback that will help strengthen the effectiveness of their efforts and the quality of the finished product.
3. Understanding the customer profile is essential to the overall marketing plan. The customer profiles also help with selecting the correct media for the target markets. Complete the following:
1. Provide an overview of your product
2. Choose three possible profiles for your product’s target market/audience. Explain the profiles.
4. How can this type of information on consumers be used by the marketing manager in its marketing communications & strategy?
5. Assess the market being targeted. What group(s) of consumers would most likely be drawn to the product? What are some ethical and legal implications? Explain why you are targeting these segments and three possible channels you would use to place your product for distribution to this target market.
Assignment Details (Leadership and Ethics) Discussion – 300 words or more (Due 12-15-2020)
This assignment has 4 parts:
1. Collaboration in a business environment is a best practice that leverages the collective knowledge of the team assembled. Peer evaluation and support, provided in the spirit of continuous improvement and organizational success, result in higher quality deliverables than generally possible by the efforts of an individual. Please describe the process you plan to use to conduct research, identify findings, and develop the Comprehensive Project due in Unit 5 and present a preliminary outline indicating how you intend to organize the project deliverable.
2. Please review the process and outlines of other students, providing an objective assessment and constructive feedback that will help strengthen the effectiveness of their efforts and the quality of the finished product.
3. What is the role of relationship development and management in effective leadership, and how are these concepts used in improving leadership effectiveness?
4. When and why should participation be used to improve leadership effectiveness?
Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com