Chizu Liyama

Interview Transcript

Before the War & Pearl Harbor

Were you aware of the war that was going on in the United States before you were interned?

I wasn't aware of a lot of things. I did know, for example, we went swimming. I guess it was with school. I'm trying to remember. Maybe I was in a group, I don't know. But we went swimming. We would go swimming to the pools, and then I could remember that I and some of the Japanese kids all sat outside. We had to sit on benches and watch the other kids go swimming because we weren't allowed to go swimming. Places like Sutro Baths. I could remember we all used to envy people who could go swimming there because we couldn't, but it never occurred to us to challenge it in any way. We just said, "Well, that's the way it is." But I did not encounter discrimination per se because we were in a sense prized. The teachers really loved us because we worked so hard. And we were so good. So when we were so good in American school, we let loose in the Japanese school. I felt so sorry for the teacher in Japanese school because everybody was so rambunctious. We would go to school till three o'clock or something, and then about from four to six was Japanese school. And we were terrible. I think if you ask most Japanese my age who went to Japanese school, they will say they did not learn Japanese. We socialized with each other, and the poor teachers were really distraught. When I was in high school, I used to cut Japanese school all the time. And the Japanese school teacher never told my parents because, you know, we were tuition. My father used to pay to have us go to Japanese school, but if we didn't appear then my father would not pay. So they didn't tell them, and we used to cut all of the time.

Pearl Harbor Day

How had your life change right up until you were interned after the war started?

We went to high school, and when I was in high school that was when I began to feel the difference, the difference between being a white American and an American of a minority group like the Japanese. And I had a black friend, but at Galileo there weren't many black kids. But the Japanese got together, the Chinese got together—we didn't do it together—but we had all kinds of social activities even though we were not part of the school activities per se. I could remember, for example, going to a prom and dancing all night just with my escort who came, whereas the other white kids were dancing with other white kids. And I think that's when we realized we've got to go in a group so that we would at least be able to exchange partners. So we had our own dances, our own socials, our own parties, very separate. We lived a separate life from the white life that we had with the high school that we went to. Although people in high school were okay, but they didn't have social ties. I used to help people with their homework because I always did my homework and gave it out if people wanted to copy some of the stuff. They were very happy to get that, but when they had a party in their house or whatever we were never invited. So we felt that distinction between the whites and between us as minority people.

When I went to Cal, we had again wonderful social groups of Japanese Americans, and to this day I see them. We have a group that meets—my college friends—but they are all Japanese Americans. I did not have any real good Caucasian friends. I was in my senior year. I was in the Fair Labor Standard Club—or something like that—to make sure that everybody got wages that were I think at that time forty cents an hour, and I remember working for forty cents an hour. We made sure that at least that was the minimum standard that they had. I knew people along that line, but never became close with them. My closest friends then and now are Japanese Americans. I regret that because I wish that I knew some people. I wish that I had been more forward in trying to make friends with them, but, you know, it was one of those things.

December 7th, are you leading up to December 7th? December 7th, we were in church, and we came out of church and we heard. At that time we had boys running up and down with extras. And they're saying, "Extra! Extra! The Japs Bomb Pearl Harbor." We looked at each other and said, "Where is Pearl Harbor?" We didn't know where it was. We came running home to my father. We said to my father, "Look at that, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor is in Hawaii. Why did they do that?" And my father who was very nationalistic said, "Oh, Japan wouldn't do that. That is British propaganda," he says. We said, "British propaganda? Is that what it is?"

I went to Cal, and Cal is a wonderful, wonderful place, I think. It really expanded my world in many ways. The world of literature, the world of history, the world of science, all of that was expanded. I was a liberal arts major for a long time, a psychology major. Let me tell you, when I went to Cal, I had an advisor and the advisor said, "Well, Miss Kitano, what would you like to do? What would you like to be?" I said, "I would like to be a teacher. I really want to be a teacher or a librarian." I said, "Teacher." And he said, "Well, I hate to tell you this," he said, "but there are no jobs for Japanese teachers," that Japanese Americans can not become teachers. And you know instead of challenging it, at that time I said, "Well, then what else could I be?," and he thought social worker, and my sister said, "Oh, be a social worker." So then I took psychology as my major and enjoyed that very much, wonderful teachers. But I could remember while I was in there that remnants of feelings of what was going on in the world began to seep into us even though we were a very closed Japanese American group. I remember going to a lecture just in September, and this guy—I don't know who he is, I can't remember who he was—but he came in to speak to the Japanese American group, our club. He said, "Things are not good between Japan and the United States. You know, there might possibly be a war." We all laughed. We said, "How could there possibly be a war between Japan and the United States?," because we didn't know enough to be able to see what was going on.

I could remember that we were really closed in on our own activities. One of the things that I tell, when I go to the University of California to speak, I tell them that we used to have things like treasure hunts on the campus, and we would be out at twelve o'clock at night looking for all of the clues, etc., etc. A bunch of girls going out there. Nobody ever thought that you would get hurt. Today, when I go to Cal at night, coming home my husband always calls and says, "Are you okay?" I have to check with him going back. But, it was so different, the times were so different. Everybody was poor. At Cal, we could immediately see the class distinctions of people who were able to live in some of the nice—we saw the sorority kids and how different they were from us. But, it didn't really bother us in any way because we had our own things we could be involved with.

December 7th comes, and we get this thing. We go home. Then I went to the library because it was during the period of finals at Cal. So we went to the library and there some of the girls were really upset. They began to cry. And I said, "Why are you crying?" And they said, "Because something is going to happen to us, something is going to happen to us because we're Japanese." We all kept saying, "But we're citizens, we're citizens." But it didn't seem to make any difference. At the beginning, things were pretty quiet. About a month later, the newspapers came out with a lot of stories about Pearl Harbor and how the Japanese in Hawaii sabotaged the war effort and things of that kind. We didn't know. We knew that we had friends in Hawaii. The first thing we worried about was, “Are they safe? Did the Japanese bombs hit them?” Evidently, some of them did. But we didn't know about that. So it was a terrible period. I could remember when getting into the war effort and being stranded in a Berkeley streetcar for about two hours one time, because the "Clear" didn't go through and we had to stay where we were. We were sitting in the streetcar like sitting ducks if they ever had a bomb. We were so totally unprepared—there were no places you could go to for shelter, or whatever. It was a period where really we felt odd because we're Japanese Americans. We have faces of the enemy. In January, the whole thing began to come apart. All these people began talking about the Japanese and how they were living close to the, I guess, vital parts of America—like the oil things—that they were close to the coast and they were flashing all kinds of messages, none of which were true, but they were all in the newspapers.

Leaving for Internment

Did the government ever tell you why you were being interned?

No, they never told us. It was something—we were so naive, which you would never do today, but we were so naive that we just accepted what the government said. We said, "This is unfair, it's not right," but nobody thought about any organized kind of resistance or anything. And let me add, places like the ACLU did not protest it either. There was nobody that protested it except for the American Friends Service Committee, a few church groups, but that was it. When we look through the commission hearings—they had hearings before we left—they knew that they were going to leave us, but they had put together a commission to hear—and this was way back in 1941/'42—and they had a commission that looked as to whether they should send us in or not and it was just a loaded committee. People who already had started in motion the things that they were doing already to get us into the camps. When we read that now, it’s very interesting, commission hearings in 1942 that put us in; the government never told us why. They just made us go.

Can you talk about your experiences when you first saw your father?

It was a Department of Justice camp my father went to, they had individual hearings. We never had individual hearings.  There was never an opportunity for us to protest about our innocence, or whatever.  My father had that opportunity in that Department of Justice camp, and they came to the conclusion (I got a copy of the report that they had, a lot of which was blacked out but still I could see the copy) that my father was no threat to the United States.  So he was released and he came to us in the camp.  He stayed with us in the camps until 1945.

Was he forced to remain in the camp with you?

Yes.  He could not go back to California.  As far as our property was concerned —the lease for the hotel—my father had bought a property in Japantown under my sister's name, so that my sister could be the owner because she was a citizen, and he could not be an owner.  He bought it under her name, so he had that.  He had two pieces of property. And the first one, a very wonderful guy, Mr. Pearson, who was black, was one of our residents in our hotel.  We said, "Oh, he'll take over," and he took over for us, collected the rent, etc., and we told him "just keep it.  Keep the-whatever it is- and all." He kept everything, it was there and everything was still in order when my father went back, and then my father gave up the lease and decided to live in the other apartment building that he owned in Japantown which later, was re-developed out.  My father was an entrepreneur.  He bought some property, which helped him.

How did you prepare to go to the camp?

That was really a difficult thing.  We had five days in which to prepare.  I don't know how it is with you, but for us to go on a trip, it takes us about that time to figure out what we're going to take, and how we're going to get there, etc.  We didn't know where we were going, we didn't know how long we were going to stay, we didn't know what was going to happen to us.  So what do you take, you know? We went, most of us, very unprepared.  My mother was so cute, though.  We were so poor, she says, "well, don't bring your good clothes?"  We said, "If we don't bring good clothes, what are we going to wear?"  She said, "Well, wear the things you're going to throw out." We were so poor; we didn't have very much, so we were going to take whatever was serviceable.  But again, one little suitcase—what could you put into it?  So we wore the same thing over and over again, and while we were in camp we were allowed to get things from Sears Roebuck, or Montgomery Wards. So sometimes you go out to a dance and about five people have the same dresses on because we all get it from Sears Roebuck or Montgomery Wards.

It was, again, a very difficult time, because of my sisters: one was in Berkeley, the other in Japantown, and they were with their families, they had little babies and all.  It was, again, that separation.  The night before we left we all got together and we cried.  We just cried, because we didn't know when we were going to see each other again. Because we were young—we were only—we were young, life was looked on very differently from my parents who were—and now that I'm 84, my parents were young at that time. My father was in his 50's, my mother was in her 40's, but we thought they were so ancient and so old. It was hard for us to imagine what it must have been for them at that time because they thought—my mother said, "They're going to kill us." I said, "Oh, Mama, we live in America. They're not going to kill us." She says, "Well, they are going to put us in slave labor." And I said, "Look Momma, I don't think they'll do that either." I said, "We have President Roosevelt." I thought at that time President Roosevelt was considered really a liberal person. I think the fact that he was liberal, and yet put us into the camp- it was the politics of the whole thing. There was just a lot of political maneuvering.

Were there people who were not of Japanese descent helping you?

Yeah.  There were.  In fact, there's a good book out now that my friend wrote about people who stuck their necks out to help us, who really got vilified by other people because they said they would help, and they were helpful. She wrote a book about all these people who also suffered because they came out and said, "This is wrong.  You shouldn't put people like that into the camps." They really suffered economically.  I think there was a publisher in Seattle who wrote all kinds of editorials, kept in touch with the Japanese, and was in the camps throughout.  People like that were threatened, their lives were threatened.  Their newspaper lost a lot of ads, and things like that. We could see the good in people, and we could see the negative parts of people.

How did you feel about being interned once you were there?

Once we were there, we were so doggone busy because, again, as I said, I knew so little and here I was in charge of recreation and education.  Fortunately, some people came in and took the education part for me, but I was in charge of recreation for 18,000 people, and what do you do with that?  We were just really busy organizing all kinds of things, but I learned a lot.  It really was a learning experience for me.  I learned how to push and how to pull, and the guy I worked for, Spike England, was a football player, or something like that.  He was a very kind, very nice guy.  I'd never been to Los Angeles, so he took me to Los Angeles when he went on one of his buying sprees.  We had dinner out there.  I mean, having dinner in a restaurant was like pie in the sky because we were in camp; we had this cruddy food and everything else!

Were you allowed to leave camp?

Because I was going with him, we got special permission.  He (Spike England) had this secretary, a beautiful Japanese-American woman, who was being groomed to be a movie star at the time.  She just lost everything!  But she was his secretary.

Camp Community

Tell us more about being able to leave. What was the law behind that?

You could leave. When we were in Santa Anita, I had an opportunity to leave, to go on to college—for graduate work at Smith College, because they offered a scholarship. My mother cried because she didn't want me to go, because she wanted the family to be together. To her it was very important that the family was together. She also was afraid for me because she said "You're going out all by yourself, you don't know anybody, you're going to be in some east coast city—Smith college is in Massachusetts (I think)— so she refused to let me go. Anybody below 21 had to have a signature from their parents. My mother refused to sign. I wished I had been able to go because it was a real opportunity. They took care of my room and board, they took care of everything for me to go. My friend Ishka Uchida, who became a writer—and her books are now all over—she wrote about her experiences in camp. She and I were recipients of this scholarship. Because I couldn't go somebody else went, I could remember that.

If the camps were so bad, and you had the opportunity to leave and do what you wanted, why did you return?

We couldn't leave. I had a scholarship, that would have a student leave, then you could leave. The way the student leave came about is interesting. People at the University of California and the people who were with the YWCA of the University, they put together a fair play committee. They were the people who pushed to get the Japanese-American students, who were at Cal, to go to some of the other graduate schools. They were behind this push, to develop what they called student relocation committee. They were the people who gave scholarships for people, opening up universities and colleges. Most of the colleges that opened up were colleges that were Christian. Christian Colleges opened up much better than the others. The state colleges did not open up for a long time because, the state, again, is so much a part of the political scene, because its a public university. Maybe about 3000 people eventually left camp to go onto colleges because of student relocation.

Student relocation is still on today, and the reason is because the Japanese American students who were recipients of the aid got together—my friend Nobuko put some of the people together, and they developed the Nissei Student Relocation Committee. We all gave money every year, to make sure that other Asian students—people coming in from Laos, North or South Vietnam—to make sure that they had the opportunities we were offered when we were in camp. This has been going on now for a long time. So every year we give money to this group to make sure that the Student Relocation Committee goes on.

Were students the only people who were able to leave the camps? (4-6)

Well, after a while we went to Topaz after Santa Anita. In Topaz, life was totally different. In Santa Anita there was like impermanence. It wasn't going to be permanent. You could still smell the orange blossoms, and you could still see some greenery because we were in Santa Anita. You could see the trees and everything else. Well we went to camp in Topaz, and it's in the desert, the real heart of the desert. They took all the greasewood and everything out because they were putting the buildings up, so that every time the wind blew you had a sandstorm, all over the place, so much so that you couldn't see. By that time they had the places built, really ugly looking buildings. We were all put into different blocks, and you could hardly see the next one because the sand was around. The thing about Topaz, which I thought was most beautiful, was the nighttime; you could see the stars. The stars were so big, and they were glowing, almost felt like you reached them.

I guess the high school students said that their favorite song was "Don't Fence Me In"—They’d sing it all the time, "Don't Fence Me in". Some of my friends, who were high school students, were there all the way through! They have their high school reunions. What's interesting is the town of Delta. We were twelve miles away from Delta—this was in Topaz—I was heading social service committee. We had social workers in each block, and I was part of the group working together with the different social workers. We took care of problems in the block. We also had Issei, (the first generation people who spoke Japanese) as Block Managers. We used to call them "Blockheads" of our camp. My father was a Block Manager.

Again, it was this time that I really became serious, because now we were getting families that were disintegrating because of the situation. I asked them, how would you like to live in one room with your father and mother, your sisters and brothers all around, your aunts in the next room or whatever; All knowing exactly what you do every minute of the time. It was really a difficult period: Gossip, false gossip, consuming the camp. These were people who had time on their hands, and didn't know what else to do. They would gossip a lot. I could remember when I was in Santa Anita, and I was holding hands with a boyfriend. We were walking around, and when I came home, back to my cabin—back to the horse stall—my mother said, "Where have you been and what have you been doing?" I said, "I was just walking". She got very upset, because the whole camp—everyone in that area—said, "You know, something is going on with your daughter!" You had to be so careful.

How did you feel about everyone knowing what you were doing?

That's right, what you were doing, and I said why would you go on a date? I mean there's everybody knowing exactly what's going on. One of these days I should write a book called "Sex in Camp." My brother in law said "didn't you ever hear about the ambulances?" and I said no, I never heard about the ambulances—we had some ambulances in Topaz—and he said, "guess what they were used for?" They were used when guys would make propositions to the girls and they would go over to the hospital. They would use the ambulances. I said, well, nobody ever asked me! It was really funny. My husband and I didn't get married in camp because you could hear every noise that people made. When we were in camp they just had the tops of the building, but there was nothing under that. So, if you had a fight with your mother or father, everybody in camp knew about it, because people heard. They'd say, "Did you know what was going on in this thing? So and so was having a fight." Fortunately, we didn’t fight in our family, we didn't fight like that, but we knew who did!

They would tell us when people were getting babies. Japanese are not supposed to cry. You aren't supposed to yell. That thing is so strong, I didn't cry and I didn't yell, because I could remember my mother saying "Don't cry and don't yell when you're getting a baby!" But there were some women who cried. Then the whole camp, "Did you know that Masako cried when she was getting a baby?" It was just terrible like that, because everyone knew everybody else's business because there were no secrets in camp. So what happened of course, my husband and I said, "We're not going to get married in camp". There was- they called it a “honeymoon cottage” at the very end of camp—they didn't have one side. That was the “honeymoon cottage” and people would say you know "Did you hear all the noise last night?" So we didn't want that. It was really a strange situation, and the boys used to complain. They couldn't hold hands.

My friend Kiku tells me this funny story. She said she was in high school, and it was the last dance. So for the last dance, they turned the lights out. Totally dark, they were supposed to be dancing in the dark. One night they were doing that, along came this Issei, being this Japanese guy, first generation. He came in and said, "Oh no, what are you doing?" He puts the light on, and everybody just looks so embarressed. You look around, there are boys with lipstick marks on their cheeks! He looked around and began to yell at them, telling them they all had to go home. She said the next morning, all over camp they said "These Nissei kids are going crazy! It's wrong what they're doing." Japanese have very strong things about relationships between boys and girls. They still have some but not as bad. She said it was so embarrassing, because everyone knew about what had happened. From then on they didn't make it totally dark.

Were the young men looked down upon if they requested her services?

Yes, when I'm talking about young men, there were a lot of Issei men. They couldn't get married. Most of them, especially the farm workers—your immigrant group—didn't get married. It was very difficult; I think there was a ruling in 1920 that picture brides stopped. So it was from 1910 to 1920 that the picture brides came, but after that it was stopped. Women could not come to get married to the men in the United States. You had a lot of bachelors; we had an uncle who was a bachelor. They lived a very sad life, a very lonely life. Because they were men they don't know how to bunch up like women do—women always find some kind of a social group. I think of Hisashi and his life was difficult for him. So you had these men, she was servicing these men, who were older. Not so much the Nissei men, because they were still eighteen, nineteen, twenty—they were still in the stage of what we call puppy love. There were a lot of marriages that did go on in camp. I said, "How was it?" They said "difficult". You know, very difficult.

Most people got married just as they were leaving to go out of camp—people didn't want to get married in camp—but they did. I really often wonder how many illegitimate children—I don't know of any single mother, when I was in camp. I did a lot of social work, and I worked with people. They were single only if their husband died young. There was very little divorce in the Japanese family at that time. They were very stable families, but they began to break away. And the reason they began to break away was that in camp, you could eat with your family, but when you're a teenager, would you eat with your mother and father or would you rather eat with your friends? The family began to disintegrate, especially the teenage kids. At least when your children are young, as a parent you still have control over them and they all ate together, but the young people began to eat out. In the end, my mother would just as soon eat with her friends than eat with the rest of us. It was piecemealing the family.

What was interesting was when it was time to leave the camps, the families got together, they made decisions together. Some of us who were at other places, reported back about what it was like in the other places. Whether this would be a good place to relocate. Everybody wanted to go back to California. They loved their homes. The people who were in farming, I think most people did not go back to the farm. The work was too hard, they lost their visas, they lost their farms, so they went into the city. I worked in Chicago, I got out. I could not get out on the student leave thing because of that, so I got out generally, again, because I had a college education, and prospects of jobs were okay for me. You had to have a prospect of a job to go out. They had early releases for a short time. They were like braceros, they were like part-time workers, who went out to work and then had to come back to the camp. They made more money by going out to work, because they got the wages—minimum wages—outside. At camp they got something like sixteen, eighteen dollars a month. When you went out of camp you made something like forty dollars. So people began to go out.

THE EFFECTS OF MUSIC THERAPY FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM

The Effects of Music Therapy for Children with Autism

My intended career is occupational therapist. Children with Autism normally have difficulty interacting and communicating with other people. The play skills, activities, and interests of these children are limited most of the times. As an Occupational Therapist, I would do my best to help children with autism develop interactive skills. Occupational Therapists are knowledgeable in physiological, emotional, and social effects of an injury or illnesses. Through a person’s daily activities, occupational therapists study how they interact with their environment and their growth and development. The knowledge gained from studying a person’s daily activities and their interaction with others helps in promoting skills for living independently for people living with autism. Through evaluation and therapy, occupational therapists, parents and teachers, can help the children with autism achieve goals in classroom performance, social interaction and behavior.

Thesis Statement: The Effects of Music Therapy for Children with Autism

The Effects of Music Therapy for Children with Autism

Bharathi, G., Venugopal, A., & Vellingiri, B. (2019). Music therapy as a therapeutic tool in improving the social skills of autistic children. The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-019-0091-x

This article investigates how music therapy improves social skills development in autistic children and whether the improvements are long lasting. The study had 54 children with mild to severe autism. They were divided into an active group and passive group. The study design had a pre-test/post test and a follow-up. For 3 months, the participants received music therapy and a 3 months follow-up was also conducted. The study found that music therapy improves social skills in children with autism and the effects are steady. The article was published in the Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. Therefore, the information in the article was reviewed by professionals in a similar field hence ensuring its quality. The authors of the article work for the Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology in Bharathiar University. The article was published in 2019, therefore, it is up to date. The article will be useful in explaining the long-term effects of music therapy on children with autism. It will also be useful in determining what social skills are improved through music therapy.

Calleja-Bautista, M., Sanz-Cervera, P., & Tarraga-Minguez, R. (2016). The effectiveness of music therapy in autism spectrum disorder: a literature review. Psychologist Papers, 37(2), 152-160.

This article discusses how music therapy has been used as an intervention mechanism on people with autism. The researchers aimed to determine the degree of effectiveness of music therapy interventions. Of the 18 studies reviewed, there were statistically significant improvements in 11 of the studies. For the other seven studies, there were improvements but not statistically significant. The article was published in the Psychologist Papers journal. Therefore, the information in the article was reviewed by professionals in a similar field hence ensuring its quality. The quality of the article is also assured by the authors who work for the University of Valencia. The article was published in 2019, therefore; it is up to date. The article will be useful for my research since it reviews several studies. The article will make it easier to highlight differences in the studies, especially the difference in methodology and their effectiveness.

Janzen, T., & Thaut, M. (2018). Rethinking the role of music in the neurodevelopment of autism spectrum disorder. Music & Science, 1, 205920431876963. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318769639

Janzen and Thaut investigate the potential role of music in supporting the neurodevelopment in people with autism. The researchers argue that motor and attention deficits are deeply implicated in the healthy neurodevelopment of socio-communication skills and may be key indicators of structural and functional brain dysfunction in ASD. They provide evidence for motor control and attention through developmental training based on music. Such training can be used in the treatment of autism since auditory-motor entertainment has significant effect on attention and motor functions and brain connectivity. The article was published in the SAGE Music and Science journal. Therefore, the information in the article was reviewed by professionals in a similar field hence ensuring its quality. The quality of the article is also assured by the authors who work for the Music and Health Science Research Collaboratory, Faculty of Music of Toronto. The article was published in 2018, therefore, it is up to date. The study by Janzen and Thaut will be useful as it provides a new research focus compared to previous studies. The study is a new approach in research that focuses on motor and attention functions. Previous studies have focused on improving social-emotional behaviors, communication skills, and social interaction of autistic individuals through music therapy.

Sharda, M., Tuerk, C., Chowdhury, R., Jamey, K., Foster, N., & Custo-Blanch, M. et al. (2018). Music improves social communication and auditory–motor connectivity in children with autism. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0287-3

Sharda et al. investigate the neurobehavioral outcomes of music intervention while comparing it to a non-music intervention as the control. The interventions are to determine the effect of music on brain connectivity and social communication in school children. 51 children of ages 6 and 12 received 8-12 weeks of music intervention. The control group received a similar duration of non-music intervention. The brain activity and social communication of the participants were tested before and after the intervention. The article was published in the Translational Psychiatry journal. Therefore, the information in the article was reviewed by professionals in a similar field hence ensuring its quality. The quality of the article is also assured by the authors who work for the International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), Department of Psychology, University of Montreal. The article was published in 2019, therefore, it is up to date. The study finds that music intervention for 8-12 weeks improves functional brain connectivity and social communication, therefore, a useful article for my research. This study is different since it compares music intervention to non-music intervention.

Shi, Z., Lin, G., & Xie, Q. (2016). Effects of music therapy on mood, language, behavior, and social skills in children with autism: A meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 3(3), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2016.06.018

Shi et al. investigate the effects of music therapy on mood, language, behavior, and social skills in children with autism through a meta-analysis of previous studies. The literature search was conducted on five Chinese databases. The analysis included six articles, with 300 patients. The analysis concluded that music therapy can improve social skills, behavior, sensory perception, language, and mood in children with autism. The article was published in the Chinese Nursing Research journal. Therefore, the information in the article was reviewed by professionals in a similar field hence ensuring its quality. The quality of the article is also assured by the authors who work for the First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University and Taiyuan Municipal No.2 People’s Hospital. The article was published in 2016, therefore, it is up to date. The article will be useful for my study as it provides evidence on the various effects of music on children with autism.

Woodman, A., Breviglia, E., Mori, Y., Golden, R., Maina, J., & Wisniewski, H. (2018). The Effect of Music on Exercise Intensity among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7030038

Woodman et al. investigated the effect of music on exercise intensity in school students with autism. The researchers highlighted that children with autism are at risk for obesity, have stereotypic behaviors which negatively affects their learning, and have sleeping disorders. Various forms of exercises can therefore be used to reduce the effects of these studies. 13 students were selected for the study as they underwent structured and unstructured exercise periods for six days. Random music conditions were selected; no music, slow-tempo music, and fast-tempo music. The researchers found that the exercise intensity was highest during structured exercise and during slow music conditions. The article was published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine. Therefore, the information in the article was reviewed by professionals in a similar field hence ensuring its quality. The quality of the article is also assured by the authors who work for the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences (University of Massachusetts), Boston Higashi School (Research Division), and Boston Children’s Hospital (Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience). The article was published in 2018, therefore; it is up to date. This article is different since it focuses on the effects of music on physical activities instead of brain activities like the other studies. This article will be useful for my research in highlighting the wide range of positive effects of music on children with autism.

References

Bharathi, G., Venugopal, A., & Vellingiri, B. (2019). Music therapy as a therapeutic tool in improving the social skills of autistic children. The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-019-0091-x

Calleja-Bautista, M., Sanz-Cervera, P., & Tarraga-Minguez, R. (2016). The effectiveness of music therapy in autism spectrum disorder: a literature review. Psychologist Papers, 37(2), 152-160.

Janzen, T., & Thaut, M. (2018). Rethinking the role of music in the neurodevelopment of autism spectrum disorder. Music & Science, 1, 205920431876963. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318769639

Sharda, M., Tuerk, C., Chowdhury, R., Jamey, K., Foster, N., & Custo-Blanch, M. et al. (2018). Music improves social communication and auditory–motor connectivity in children with autism. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0287-3

Shi, Z., Lin, G., & Xie, Q. (2016). Effects of music therapy on mood, language, behavior, and social skills in children with autism: A meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 3(3), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2016.06.018

Woodman, A., Breviglia, E., Mori, Y., Golden, R., Maina, J., & Wisniewski, H. (2018). The Effect of Music on Exercise Intensity among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7030038

AS 1:

Various professional organizations will assist you throughout your career. Locate 3 professional organizations (do not include the APA site) which will assist you in your future career goals. Identify the organization name, include the hyperlink to the organization, discuss what it has to offer you within your intended career goal and how it will be beneficial to you after graduation in your intended future career. Explain what personal changes you need to make to adapt to your professional life that will happen once you graduate and enter the next phase of your life and identify any areas that intimidate you.

Create a chart like the chart example below with connections to the 3 organizations you researched. Extend each row to give substantial information on each organization. Be specific when discussing each organization. Be sure to fully explain what it has to offer you as you move into your future career. Use specific organization examples that you located from the online site with career connections when you discuss how it will be beneficial to you in the future. Extend the discussion of the sites’ importance with giving any additional information you deem appropriate for each site. Include the topic of your research and the hypothesis statement from module 5. In a separate paragraph below the chart discuss personal changes you will need to make to adapt to your intended professional life and then identify and explain any areas about these changes that intimidate you. This last paragraph should be approximately 200-250 words to fully express your thoughts.

Research Topic:

Research Hypothesis Statement:

Organization Name

Hyperlink

What it has to offer

How it will be beneficial

Additional Information &/or Examples of Site

1.

2.

3.

Personal Changes:

Hist- 40 Module 11 Notes

A Nation at War:

After WWI, Americans wanted to avoid European conflicts once again and continue an isolationist policy. During the interwar period, the United States shrank the military, and by 1935, it equaled Romania in strength. As U.S. Senator from California, Hiram Johnson was at the forefront of the isolationists. When war broke out in Europe in September of 1939, the United States remained out of the conflict. Even after France's fall and England's potential fall (both allies), the United States stayed out of the conflict. The U.S. Congress passed restrictions to avoid the conflict. This attitude changed when the Japanese attacked the naval base of Pearl Harbor in Hawaii on December 7, 1941.

The Impact of Federal Spending on California:

During the war, federal spending got the United States out of the Great Depression. California (with its location on the Pacific Coast) greatly benefitted from the enormous amount of spending. During the war (1941-1945), the federal government spent $360 billion, California got 10% (over $35 billion). In one year, the state received 8.5 billion dollars. In comparison, the federal government spent $3 billion in 1930, but California received $191 million. This injection of revenue fueled the state’s economy, which was felt in all parts of it. Before 1939, California was still in recovery, and the population continued to increase, so an overabundance of labor countered any income increase. Personal Income barely exceeds the 1930 level of $5 billion (which meant per capita income decreased); however, by 1945, personal income reached $15 billion, even though the population still increased by 30%.

Increase in Military Installations

One of the areas impacted by federal dollars was military installations. The few pre-war military installations in the state were greatly expanded during the war, and new ones were created: Pendleton (Marines), Beale AFB, Roberts, McClellan AFB (Sacramento), Travis AFB (Fairfield), Oakland Army Base, and Naval Shipyard. These new bases also brought more Americans with higher salaries to local economies. Also, grants and subsidies helped personal and public investment in those regions. Almost overnight, the state’s manufacturing increased in ship and aircraft production.

Wartime Shipyards

Before 1942, Henry J. Kaiser was best known for supplying concrete for the Hoover Dam and other similar projects. He also constructed the Bay Bridge in the 1930s. By 1942, Kaiser’s ingenuity would impact shipbuilding. He opened new shipyards in Oakland, Vallejo, San Pedro, and Sausalito to supply the war against Japan. Like what Henry Ford did for antimanufacturing (with the Model T), Kaiser standardized production in shipbuilding with his Liberty Ships. Every ship was the same, which cut the amount of time for production from 51 to 14 weeks. His shipyards worked 24 hours, with three shifts for employees. By 1943, a new freighter came off the line every 10 hours (it is easy to say his company helped win the war in the Pacific).

At its peak, civilian employment was 300,000, which created a labor shortage (meaning unemployment was zero, and companies were still looking for people). To entice new people, he advertised throughout the county, especially the South, where he offered higher wages and better healthcare to the African American men in the cotton fields where they earned $1.25 a day (Kaiser offered $10 a day). Due to the higher wages, African Americans moved to the Bay Area during the war. The non-white population sored (Richmond and Vallejo experienced an increase of 2% to 14% of the cities’ people). The new people stretched the resources (schools and infrastructure) because the cities were not prepared to increase the population. Therefore, the temporary housing stayed and became slums long after the war.

The Rise of the Aircraft Industry

Besides shipbuilding, the aviation industry experienced a significant boost in spending. Before the war, the aircraft industry was minor and relied on federal, not private, investments. There were early pioneers in California during this period. First, Glenn Martin established one of the earliest plants in 1909 because of the weather and open land. Another company, Lockheed (today called Lockheed Martin), was opened in 1916 by Allen and Malcolm Lougheed in Santa Barbara but then moved to Burbank, where they changed their name Lockheed. Moreover, Donald Douglas, a young engineer, found investors like Harry Chandler and other businesspeople (banks would not give him a loan) in the 1920s to build a factory in Santa Monica (designed several planes for the Army). Finally, T. Claude Ryan, a former Army flyer, established the first daily scheduled passenger line from San Diego to LA. His company designed the Spirit of St. Louis (Charles Lindbergh’s plane across the Atlantic in 1927).

The Impact of the War

By 1939, the country was underprepared, and the factories could produce a little less than 6000 planes a year. At the start of the war, FDR soon demanded 50,000 planes a year. At the time, this was an outrageous demand, but production by 1944 was twice that number. California experienced a sharp increase in this change. For example, the state aviation manufacturing workforce increased from 1,000 in 1933 to 280,000 by 1943. Many of those employees were women, which made up 40% of the Southern California workforce (this form of employment made them more confident and independent since it was denied to them before the war).

Moreover, this industry also accounted for nearly 60% of the federal money that came to the state. The government guaranteed all costs with a small profit to the companies (so these companies did not walk away with a lot of money). Four of the country’s largest airplane factories were located near Los Angeles, with two others in San Diego. Southern California’s weather was perfect for test flights and working conditions, but the location was dangerous since the country was fighting Japan in the Pacific. These factories were camouflaged to protect against a surprise air attack.

World War II impacted various groups living within the United States. Women, African Americans, Koreans, Native Americans, and Japanese Americans all had different experiences.

Rosie the Riveter

War mobilization sparked an unprecedented growth in women’s employment to fill industrial jobs left by men. Government and private ads celebrated the independent women worker with images like Rosie the Riveter, the female industrial labor painted by Norman Rockwell as a muscle-bound and self-reliant woman. With men away at war, thousands of women were hired as electricians, steamfitters, and welders. The Richmond shipyard workforce consisted of 25% women. Women filled industrial, professional, and government jobs previously barred to them. They forced some unions like the United Auto Workers to confront equal pay for equal work, maternity leave, and childcare. Many women who had a “taste of freedom” working men’s jobs for male wages hoped to remain in the workforce after the war.

Yet, the government, employers, and unions saw women’s work as only a temporary wartime necessity. Though ads told women working in factories that they were “fighting for freedom,” their language promoted victory, not women’s rights or independence. After the war, most women war workers, especially those in high-paying industrial positions, lost their jobs to men. However, 4 million lost their jobs between 1944-46. Indeed, war ads informed Americans that their work would help secure the “American way of life” after the war—traditional families, with the women at home and men at work, enjoying household appliances and consumer goods.

African Americans

Since African Americans were excluded from unions, the United Negro Labor Committee was created to demand better insurance and voting privileges. The war impacted the attitudes of many Americans towards civil rights. In 1942, the Pittsburgh Courier, a black newspaper, called for the “Double V” Campaign, a victory over enemies abroad (Japan and Germany) and racism. As you may recall, there was a large migration of African Americans to the state during the war. Many believed they would escape the Jim Crow South to California, but they realized that the challenges and racial stereotypes remained while the location changed. Tarea Hall Pittman helped newly arrived blacks to understand the challenges they would soon face.  One African American woman, Frances Albrier, completed twice the required number in training for being a welder and was denied employment at the Kaiser plant in Richmond.

At the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Vallejo, an incident occurred with the all-black unit. On July 17, 1944, the worst disaster during the war occurred when two ammunition ships and a train exploded, killing 320 people (2/3 were African American sailors). Handling munitions is one of the most dangerous jobs because of the chance of a deadly mistake. Due to this danger, many white men in the Navy refused to work it, so the Navy gave African Americans the assignment. After the blast, 50 surviving members refused to return to work, citing unsafe working conditions and improper training. They were convicted of mutiny and went to a military prison. The efforts to overturn the convictions went nowhere. These men did not mind unloading ammunition but wondered why they were the only ones doing this dangerous work. Later, the Navy did admit that racial prejudice did exist.

During the war, African American experiences helped establish the formation of the modern civil rights movements that the country experienced in the 1950s and 60s. The U.S. government criticized Hitler’s racial theories, which led to the United States' reexamining itself.

Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Latinos during the War

The “Tiger Brigade” was a segregated unit in the California National Guard. Simultaneously, the Filipinos (the Philippines were still part of the United States) served in two regiments in the Pacific. Also, Japanese Americans served in the 442nd Regimental Team in the European theater (they were not trusted to fight against Japan), where they suffered heavy losses in Italy's invasion (later, these men received awards). The U.S. Marines recruited a Native American unit, which became known as the Code Talkers (there is a movie with the same name that was good). They used the Navajo language for codes in the Pacific because the Japanese did not know their language. Hundreds of Navajos served alongside their fellow soldiers to relay messages on the battlefield.

Moreover, to demonstrate their loyalty, Latinos enlisted in record numbers. The large Latino population in the United States experienced historical hatred and segregation, so they saw the war as a chance to prove to the country they were “All In.” In comparison to other units, the number of casualties in these units was higher. Representing 10 percent of the population in LA, Latinos made up 20% of all deaths.

Deep Distrust and Origins

The War in the Pacific was more racial than the European theater, and it revived old stereotypes like Asians being ruthless, sly, and sinister. Also, Americans believed they held permanent loyalty to Japan (even those born in the United States). On February 19, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 that declared that all Japanese descent persons were to be imprisoned, without trial, and behind barb wire walls with men guarding them. Before this was signed, many Californians pushed for it. For example, the Sacramento Bee owner, McClatchy, formed the California Joint Immigration League in 1921. Its members are made up of prominent state and labor leaders, such as Ulysses S. Webb (author of the state’s alien law) and Earl Warren (state attorney general). Earl Warren helped convince FDR of the order because he started to believe the false rumors after Pearl Harbor, but he was not the only one.

Pearl Harbor created an atmosphere of fear that consisted of false rumors of treasonous Japanese American attacks in Hawaii that persisted after the Pearl Harbor attack. Stories were spread throughout the state, making Californians fear anyone of Japanese descent. For example, stories of a vegetable truck blocking a road, or one truck rushing into an airfield and knocking the tails off one plane, or even a huge arrow cut in the sugar cane to tell the bombers where to go.

The United States was uncertain what it would do in the following weeks after the attack. For example, General John DeWitt (Head of Western Command) opposed action against Japanese Americans, even though the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce asked him to intern all Japanese in LA. It did not matter if they were citizens; however, something changed his mind. An investigation by Justice Owen Roberts created the Roberts Report, which laid blame on two individuals who failed their duties, but it also stated a spy network on Oahu had been a part of it. Federal officials used this as evidence of Japanese American disloyalty, even though there was no evidence to support espionage or sabotage claims, which was not known until after the war. With Robert’s Report in hand, DeWitt reported to the War Department and repeated some of the most influential Californians (mayor of LA, Warren, and others) calls for internment because they felt they lived amid enemies. DeWitt now sent a report recommending “people of all Japanese descent” to be considered enemies, around 112,000 (2/3 were American born). Attorney General Biddle tried to draft an argument about how this was unconstitutional, but the EO was signed before he finished.

In response to the Pacific Coast pressure, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. The EO 9066 authorized the secretary of war “whenever he or any designated Commander deems such action necessary or desirable, to prescribe military areas… from which any or all persons may be excluded.” The first question, where would they go? On March 2, all Japanese were to be voluntarily removed from the western halves of the Pacific States and the southern half of Arizona, and by the end of the month, it was no longer voluntary. Before the camps were constructed, they were sent to improvised stations (horse tracks, stables, fairgrounds. Eventually, ten internment camps were erected. At the time, they were called relocation centers and not concentration camps because of the negative connotation. Their internment destroyed the family dynamic because kids were running around being independent.

The justification was that it was a military necessity to remove them from the Pacific Coast for fear of an invasion (remember, Americans believed all 112,000 were loyal to Japan and would aid them in an invasion). The truth, the Japanese never contemplated an invasion because it is a nearly impossible event (even D-Day was a high-risk venture that worked, but Ally officials were concerned it would fail). American military officials, even DeWitt, knew it could not happen because, after the Battles of Coral Sea (May 4-8 1942) and Midway (June 4-6), the Japanese lost some of their essential aircraft carriers, thus rendering an air attack nonexistent. Moreover, the historical racism against Asians helped fueled removal support. For example, only those German Americans and Italian Americans declared dangerous were taken to camps, but the whole population was not affected (even during World War I). Also, Japanese Americans living in Hawaii were able to stay. Thousands lived near military installations, but no reported attack took place. These people worked on these bases and made up the bulk of the labor (no sabotage occurred).

In 1944, the Supreme Court heard the Korematsu Case about the legality of the order. The defendant, Fred Korematsu, refused to leave his Bay Area home and defended his action stating it violated his civil liberties because the EO was based on race. The majority of the court ruled that this was not based on race since it applied only to the Japanese and not all Asians. Therefore, the court ruled that internment was constitutional. In 1988, the United States Congress and President Ronald Reagan authorized an official apology to all 60,000 surviving Japanese Americans affected by internment.

The Election of Earl Warren

In 1942, after pushing for the Japanese Americans' internment, Earl Warren was elected California governor. His popularity led to an easy reelection in 1946, where he won both the Democratic and Republican Primaries. A native son of LA, he was born in 1891 and grew up near Bakersfield. His father was a master mechanic for the Southern Pacific Railroad and later a real estate broker. His political hero was Hiram; both went to Berkeley and earned a reputation for being a prosecutor. Unlike Hiram, Earl was much more courteous and patient. Elected in 1942, he benefited from the boost in federal spending during WWII. He sponsored an increase in services because of the rise in revenue. He alarmed his conservative allies when he supported a state health insurance law in 1945. Although Republican Progressives, as far back as 1916, endorsed this idea, it was defeated by the American Medical Association and private insurers. He also proposed to expand the highways in the state but grew disenchanted when truckers and oil companies refused to support the highway expansion via a gas tax. He saw them as short-sighted because it would have benefitted them in the long run. After all, the population increase would create more drivers and more need for shipping (it was not until the 1950s when the Federal government got involved in creating the Interstate Highway system). In 1950, he won a third term (not done before) by running as nonpartisan. In 1948, he was picked to be the Republican vice-presidential candidate (Dewey), and in 1952, he was stuck behind Sen. Robert Taft and Eisenhower for the Republican nomination. His political prospected continued to rise, but in 1953 President Eisenhower appointed him Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (more about that later).

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.

Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com