Rubric Detail

 

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following: ·   Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. ·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

77 (77%) - 85 (85%)

The responses accurately and clearly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment. The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

68 (68%) - 76 (76%)

The responses identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment. The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.

60 (60%) - 67 (67%)

The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 4 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment. The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that is vague or inaccurate. Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.

0 (0%) - 59 (59%)

The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 4 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment, or are missing. The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described, or are missing. Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing.

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Exit

Rubric

Detail

Select

Grid View

or

List View

to change the rubric's layout.

Name:

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Exit

·

Grid View

·

List View

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

In a 4

-

to 5

-

page paper,

synthesize the peer

-

reviewed research you

reviewed. Format your

Assignment as an

Annotated Bibliography.

Be sure to address the

following:

·

Properly identify 4

peer

-

reviewed research

articles you reviewed.

·

Summarize each st

udy,

explaining the

improvement to outcomes,

efficiencies, and lessons

learned from the

application of the clinical

system each peer

-

reviewed

article described. Be

specific and provide

examples.

In your conclusion,

synthesize the findings

from the 4 peer

-

r

eviewed

research articles.

77

(77%)

-

85

(85%)

The responses

accurately and clearly

identify 4 peer

-

reviewed

research articles for the

Assignment.

The responses

accurately and

thoroughly summarize in

detail each study

reviewed, explaining in

detail the improvement to

outcomes, efficiencies,

and lessons learned from

the application of the

clinical system each

peer

-

reviewed article

described.

Specific

, accurate, and

detailed examples are

provided which fully

support the responses.

68

(68%)

-

76

(76%)

The responses identify 4

peer

-

reviewed research

articles for the

Assignment.

The responses

summarize each study

reviewed, explaining the

improvement to

outcomes, efficiencies,

and lessons learned from

the application of the

clinical system each

peer

-

reviewed article

described.

Accurate examples are

provided which support

the respo

nses provided.

60

(60%)

-

67

(67%)

The responses vaguely

or inaccurately identify 4

or less peer

-

reviewed

articles for the

Assignment.

The responses

summarize each study

reviewed, explaining the

improvement to

outcomes, efficiencies,

and lessons learned

from

the application of the

clinical system each

peer

-

reviewed article

described that is vague

or inaccurate.

Examples provided to

support the responses

are vague or inaccurate.

0

(0%)

-

59

(59%)

The responses vaguely

and inaccurately identify

less than

4 peer

-

reviewed articles for the

Assignment, or are

missing.

The responses vaguely

and inaccurately

summarize each study

reviewed, explaining the

improvement to

outcomes, efficiencies,

and lessons learned from

the application of the

clinical system each

p

eer

-

reviewed article

described, or are

missing.

Examples provided to

support the responses

are vague and

inaccurate, or are

missing.

Written Expression and

Formatting

-

Paragraph

Development and

5

(5%)

-

5

(5%)

Paragraphs and

sentences follow writing

4

(4%)

-

4

(4%)

Paragraphs and

sentences follow writing

3.5

(3.5%)

-

3.5

(3.5%)

Paragraphs and

sentences follow writing

0

(0%)

-

3

(3%)

Paragraphs and

sentences follow writing

Anderson 91.5 95

Blake 75.5 90

Cheg 0 0

Dang 95 85

Engberg 80 100

Farris 55 90

Garcia 93.6 90.5

Hadad 65 60

Ionescu 100 95.5

Johnson 75 90

Kaloo 75 85

Lagos 55.5 80

Mikhailov 75 83.5

Nguyen 95 100

O'Neil 85 70

ASSIGNMENT 2 Assignment 2 tests your knowledge of Selection (Chapter 4) and Repetition (Chapter 5).

Write a program YourName-Assignment2 (replace YourName with your actual name, no spaces) that reads/inputs from a file1 students’ records (one student per line) with the following format:

LastName Tests Grade Assignments Grade

and computes and outputs (to the console) the STUDENT STATISTICS in a table format one line per student:

Student Name Total Points2 Numeric Grade3 Letter Grade4

The table should have the exact table header5.

The program should also compute and output (to the console) in the 2 rows 2 columns table format, the CLASS STATISTICS for the entire class: the number of students6 (row Number) and the average numeric grade7 (row Average) among all students. All text/character columns should have the same width, be aligned to the left and all floating-point values align to the right and formatted with 2 decimals.

You can test your program on the attached Grades.txt (do not edit the file) and you can check your output by comparing it to the sample output shown here, but your program should work on any other files that have the correct format, thus, do not hardcode the output or the number of students.

The program needs to use loops/repetition statements to read the data from the files and selection statements (Chapter 4) to compute the letter grades.

You should write the program in Visual Studio 2019 using only concepts learned in class so far (Chapters 1 to 5, so, without arrays, functions, pointers, references, and any other concepts not studied in class so far).

Create a Microsoft Word document called YourName-Assignment2-Screenshots.docx (replace YourName with your name, no spaces) that contains screenshots of your entire C++ code in editor (take multiple screenshots if the code is larger than one screen and is not readable in one screenshot), and the entire program console output in the Console Output Window for the attached Grades.txt (take multiple screenshots if the output is larger than one window).

SUBMIT your YourName-Assignment2.cpp Visual Studio 2019 C++ source code and YourName-Assignment2- Screeshots.docx screenshots document files under Assignment2 on eCampus. Do not archive the files (no ZIP, RAR or other archived files) or submit other file formats.

1 The program should work on any file with that format with different numbers of line. Do not hardcode the number of lines, compute it instead when you read from the file. 2 You compute the Total Points as the sum between Tests and Assignments. 3 You compute the Numeric Grade as the total points (from all the evaluations) divided by 2. The value will be between 0 and 100 4 The Letter Grade is: A if the numeric grade is between 89.5 and 100, B if the numeric grade is between 79.5 and 89.49, C if the numeric grade is between 69.5 and 79.49, D if the numeric grade is between 59.5 and 69.49, and F if the numeric grade is between 0 and 59.49. 5 The table header should have the exact text, but it does not have to be on 2 separate lines/rows, you can put them on one row (.e.g. “Total Points” on one row) 6 The number of lines from the file 7 The sum of all the numeric grades divided by the number of students

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.

Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com