Remember your project should include the following:
· A “criminal minds” individual will be your “patient” from the list below for your project.
· A brief history of the patient including diagnoses (documented or your thoughts if no diagnosis is recorded) and medications (if not applicable, write about which mediations you think would be appropriate). Not a lot of gory details about their crimes.
· Any substance abuse, addiction or violence issues surrounding this mental health problem. Describe the attempted interventions that have been made for your patient, and identify what has been successful and what has not. (If not enough interventions were found, please write about what interventions you think would have been appropriate)
· Think about interventions that may have been helpful. Include sources for evidence-based practice. What might have made the difference between functional mental illness to the progression to criminal behavior.
· Include 3 relevant Nursing Diagnoses for your patient along with 3 outcomes (should be measurable!) and 3 appropriate interventions for each diagnosis.
· How will you evaluate effectiveness? Include an evaluation tool or rubric. – Most nursing diagnosis books include tools you can use.
· Include everything listed on the rubric!
· The paper should use APA formatting and be at least 3 pages in length
· Grammarly Plagiarism Report to be turned in with submission, should be <10% plagiarism
CRIMINAL MINDS
Richard Speck
Aileen Wournos
Jeffrey Dahmer
John Wayne Gacey
H. H. Holmes
Ted Bundy
Jim Jones
Charles Cullen
Earl Nelson
Charles Manson
Genene Jones
Richart T. Chase
Ed Giehn
BTK Dennis Rader
R. Kuklinski
DC Sniper
Bob Yates
Albert Fish
Grim Sleeper
Son of Sam
Columbine Killers
Unabomber
Harpe Brothers
Menendez Bros
Michael Swango
Kristen Gilbert
Henry Lee Lucas
Ottis Toole
Gary Heidnik
Edmund Kemper
Valerie Solanas
Mark Chapman
Rodney Alcala
Charles Sobhraj
John Wayne Wilson
Craig List Killers
Jack the Ripper
Nannie Doss
John Wilkes Booth
Darren Deon Vann
Gary Ridgway
Lucrezia Borgia
Adam Lanza
Rostov Ripper
Richard Beasley
Lisa Montgomery
Miranda Barbour
Amy Bishop
Marie Besnard
Patrick Sherrill
Scoring Rubric:
Criteria |
Points |
Describes the patient that is the subject of the project including diagnoses, medications, and history OR describes the community, its strengths and problems and the mental health issue that will be the subject of the paper. |
4 |
Includes any substance abuse or violence issues for the patient or community |
2 |
Discusses attempted interventions, what has been successful and what has not. |
4 |
Describes own personal thoughts about the patient's or community's mental health issues. |
4 |
Describes any cognitive concerns and possible interventions. |
2 |
Writes a nursing care plan including three priority nursing diagnoses with r/t and AEB factors. |
4 |
Includes outcomes in NOC language and interventions in NIC language with a plan for evaluation. |
4 |
Identifies mental health resources that can be used with the patient or community. Includes an educational tool. |
4 |
Supports answers using academic resources, with citations in APA format. |
2 |
Total |
30 |
Reference for 3rd week
Uniform Commercial Code |
My State is LA |
Go to The Legal Information Institute website and search for Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) for your state. Access the UCC Law as it has been adopted by your state. Read the Secured Transactions (Chapter 9) of the Uniform Commercial Code. If you cannot access the full text of your state's UCC, you may review the website for the state of Arizona.
URL:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/table_ucc
Chapter 9, Secured Transactions: Uniform Commercial Code Law |
|
Read "Chapter 9, Secured Transactions: Uniform Commercial Code Law," located on the Arizona State Legislature website.
URL:
https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=47
Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 |
|
Read the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005," located on the Bankruptcy Reform page of the United States Department of Justice website.
URL:
http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy/2006/09/07/usab5404.pdf
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
BUS-623 | BUS-623-O500 | Legal Relationships Essay | 150.0 | |||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
Content | 75.0% | |||||||
Discusses the history of the UCC from the development of the UCC to its current use, citing changes and modifications made since adoption. | 25.0% | Does not discuss the history of the UCC and/or discussion is inaccurate. | Attempts to discuss the history of the UCC, but discussion and/or development of the UCC to its current use is inaccurate and/or incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important details; no research evidence is cited. | Discusses the history of the UCC including development; discussion addresses some changes or modifications made since adoption of the UCC, but lacks some essential details or clarity. Supports discussion by citing at least one reference as evidence of understanding. | Discusses the history of the UCC; discussion demonstrates clear and coherent understanding of the development of the UCC to its current use; some changes and modifications made since adoption are delineated. Supports discussion by citing at least one reference as evidence of understanding. | Discusses the history of the UCC; discussion demonstrates a clear and comprehensive understanding of the development of the UCC to its current use, citing all the changes and modifications made since adoption; demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Supports discussion by citing two or more relevant references as evidence of understanding. | ||
Discusses the current use of the UCC and addresses a minimum of two articles of the UCC. | 25.0% | Does not discuss the current use of the UCC and/or discussion is inaccurate. | Discusses the current use of one or more articles of the UCC. Explanation is weak and missing many important details; no support or evidence for argument is provided. | Discusses the current use of one article of the UCC with minimal development. Discussion is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity; delineation is supported by citing at least one reference as evidence of understanding. | Discusses the current use of two or more articles of the UCC with clear explanation and relevant examples. Delineation is supported by citing at least one reference as evidence of understanding. | Discusses the current use of two or more articles the UCC with comprehensive explanation and multiple relevant examples. Supports discussion by citing two or more relevant references as evidence of understanding; demonstrates an exceptional perception of the topic. | ||
Discusses the parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC. | 25.0% | Does not discuss the parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC. | Discusses the parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC, but discussion is inaccurate. | Discusses the parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC; explanation is somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity. No support or evidence for argument is provided. | Discusses the parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC in a clear and coherent manner; explanation is strong with sound details. Discussion is supported by citing at least one reference as evidence of understanding. | The discussion of the parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC is expertly written; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details. Discussion is supported by citing two or more reference as evidence of understanding. | ||
Organization and Effectiveness | 15.0% | |||||||
Thesis Development and Purpose | 8.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 7.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
Format | 10.0% | |||||||
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
Total Weightage | 100% |
Module 10
Scoring Rubric: Course Project Semester Project Completion
Criteria Points
· Describes the patient that is the subject of the project including diagnoses, medications, and history OR describes the community, its strengths and problems and the mental health issue that will be the subject of the paper. - 4
· Includes any substance abuse or violence issues for the patient or community - 2
· Discusses attempted interventions, what has been successful and what has not. - 4
· Describes own personal thoughts about the patient's or community's mental health issues. - 4
· Describes any cognitive concerns and possible interventions. - 2
· Writes a nursing care plan including three priority nursing diagnoses with r/t and AEB factors. - 4
· Includes outcomes in NOC language and interventions in NIC language with a plan for evaluation. - 4
· Identifies mental health resources that can be used with the patient or community. Includes an educational tool. - 4
· Supports answers using academic resources, with citations in APA format. - 2
Total - 30
Please Follow the Criminal Minds Guidelines.
Now, it's time to turn in your semester project. Remember your project should include the following:
· A Mental Health Concern - and the Patient or Community - for your project.
· A brief history of the patient including diagnoses and medications - or a brief description of the community issue.
· Any substance abuse, addiction or violence issues surrounding this mental health problem. Describe the attempted interventions that have been made for your patient or community, and identify what has been successful and what has not. Submit a rough draft of information gathered so far.
· Describe your thoughts regarding your patient's or community's mental health issue. Are there any cognitive concerns? Think about interventions that may be helpful. Include sources for evidence-based practice.
· List appropriate nursing interventions for your chosen patient or community. How will you evaluate effectiveness? Include an evaluation tool or rubric.
· Complete your Semester Project by identifying mental health resources that can be used for your chosen patient or community. Finish with an educational tool for your patient or community.

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com