| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| LDR-463 | LDR-463-O501 | Practice a Professional Interview | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Introduction | 5.0% | Presentation does not contain an introduction. | Presentation contains an introduction but is incomplete or incorrect. | Presentation contains an introduction but is lacking relevant details. | Presentation contains an introduction and includes relevant supporting details. | Presentation contains an introduction and includes substantial supporting details; the introduction enhances the overall interview. |
| Integrate Job Position and Description | 15.0% | Integration of the selected job position and description are not included. | Integration of the selected job position and description are included but are incomplete or incorrect. | Integration of the selected job position and description are included but lack relevant details. | Integration of the selected job position and description are included and contain relevant supporting details. | Integration of the selected job position and description are included and contain substantial supporting details which enhances the overall interview. |
| Integrate work experience and connect strengths, abilities, and personality traits. | 15.0% | Integration of work experience, strengths, abilities, and personality traits are not included. | Integration of work experience, strengths, abilities, and personality traits are included but are incomplete or incorrect. A clear connection is not made to the selected job description. | Integration of work experience, strengths, abilities, and personality traits are included but lack relevant supporting detail. A clear connection is somewhat made to the selected job description. | Integration of work experience, strengths, abilities, and personality traits are complete and include relevant supporting detail. A clear connection is mostly made to the selected job description. | Integration of work experience, strengths, abilities, and personality traits include substantial supporting detail. A clear connection is made to the selected job description and enhances the overall interview. |
| Consideration for the Position | 10.0% | Demonstration of why you should be considered for the position is not included. | Demonstration of why you should be considered for the position is included but is incomplete or incorrect. | Demonstration of why you should be considered for the position is included but lacks relevant supporting detail. | Demonstration of why you should be considered for the position was complete and includes relevant supporting detail. | Demonstration of why you should be considered for the position was included with substantial supporting detail. |
| Integrate Interview Questions | 15.0% | Integration of the required interview questions is not included. | Integration of the required interview questions is included but is incomplete or incorrect. | Integration of the required interview questions is included but lacks relevant supporting details. | Integration of the required interview questions is complete and includes relevant supporting details. | Integration of the required interview questions is complete and includes substantial supporting details. |
| Closing and Final Statements | 5.0% | Presentation does not contain a closing with final statements. | Presentation contains a closing slide with final statements but is incomplete or incorrect. | Presentation contains a closing slide with final statements but lacks relevant supporting detail. | Presentation contains a closing slide with final statements is complete and includes relevant supporting detail. | Presentation contains a closing slide with final statements is complete and includes substantial supporting details; the closing statements enhance the overall interview. |
| Presentation of Content | 15.0% | The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information. | The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Layout | 8.0% | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
| Language Use and Audience Awareness includes sentence construction, word choice, etc. | 5.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
| Mechanics of Writing includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use. | 4.0% | Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. | Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. | Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc. as appropriate to assignment and style. | 3.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
