Pathos  is related to the words patheticsympathy, and empathy. Whenever you accept a claim based on how it makes you feel without fully analyzing the rationale behind the claim, you are acting on pathos. Appeals to pathos touch a nerve and compel people to not only listen, but to also take the next step and act in the world because pathos is often the strongest of the emotional appeals. In addition to the generic idea of something being "emotional" or "sad" or "moving," other strong emotions can include humorpatriotismloveguilt, etc.

Men get in bar fights when someone insults their girlfriend because of their emotions, not their logic. They don't stop to consider, “Well, if I punch this dude in the face, I’m going to probably break some fingers, maybe get my butt kicked, and probably go to jail.” Instead, it’s simply "go time" because they have been persuaded to get in a fight by their emotions, not their logic.

Here's another example:  Imagine that I was trying to persuade you to volunteer at a homeless shelter or a soup kitchen. I could give you all the statistics in the world regarding homelessness and the lack of funds, space, and resources. That would appeal to your logic and it would “make sense” to volunteer your time and/or money. But that doesn’t mean you would do it. Imagine instead that I tell you the story of just one homeless person. His name is Charlie.  I went into detail about his personal experiences and the specific conditions and situations he has had to deal with. I stood Charlie in front of you and made you look him in the eye to tell him you weren’t going to help. You’re probably more likely to help now, right? This is because I’ve appealed to you emotionally.

Some of your introductions for WP3 contain the use of pathos as well. You draw readers in emotionally so that they care that you care. Perhaps they feel a bit of sympathy for you. That sympathy makes them more likely to be persuaded by you.

As mentioned above, pathos is often considered the most powerful of the rhetorical appeals. This is because the results of using pathos can be dangerous, more dangerous than a bar fight. Consider Adolf Hitler. Unfortunately, Hitler was an excellent public speaker. He could stir a crowd into a frenzy with messages about the "Fatherland" and a safe, pure world. But Hitler used those persuasive abilities to motivate people to commit horrible atrocities. His writings and other communications were rife with logical fallacies. It made no logical sense to try to eliminate all the Jews in the world, but for Nazis, it made emotional sense.

Let's consider another great speaker, President Obama. Now wait, before you look up the phone number for the Chair of the English Department, NO, I am NOT comparing Hitler to Obama. Okay? The only similarity I am drawing is that they both gave good speeches.Ok....so.... Obama was first elected because he was a rockstar. Seriously. Some of you might remember the music videos created by musical artist will.i.am that featured dozens of celebrities singing the words of one of Obama's campaign speeches (available here if you are interested:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsV2O4fCgjk ). He was the first presidential candidate to make widespread use of Facebook and his own website during a campaign. And of course, he was trying to be the first African American president. Voters wanted to be a part of that history. His opponent, John McCain, the old, grouchy white guy, had no chance. Young people voted for Obama not because of his politics, with no logic other than "change." They voted for the way he made them feel.

Of course Hitler and Obama are extreme examples (still not comparing the two). People outside of Germany could see through Hitler's emotional appeals, but they couldn't stop it. Many voters believed Obama's speeches where style over substance. Therefore, in writing, you need to use pathos sparingly, not because you may become the next Hitler, but because when overused, emotional language crosses over from persuasive to corny. If it is obvious that you are trying to pull at the heart strings of a reader, they are less likely to listen.

For example, when I was in college at Ohio University, I got a part-time job calling alumni asking for donations. It was a terrible job, or maybe I was just terrible at it. Here's why: the rule was that once the person answered the phone, I could not ask them for a donation for at least five minutes. For those five minutes, I was supposed to talk to them about their experiences when they were at OU. I was supposed to make them feel nostalgic, get them laughing and reminiscing. I must not have been very good at this, or it was obvious what I was trying to do because after about 30 seconds, I usually heard something like, "Yeah, ok, so what do you want?" or "Yeah, school was fun. You're calling for money aren't you?" I wasn't persuasive because I wasn't genuine, and that came across as corny.

Consider these other examples:

· A little kid that whines to get his way. It works on Grandma, but not on his parents who see it every day.

· The car salesman going on and on about wanting to protect your family during an accident.

· The boss who jokes around with everyone, all the time, constantly, right before he asks you to work late.

Here are some of the features of the pathetic appeal:  

· Concrete language

· Emotionally loaded language

· Emotional examples

· Vivid descriptions

· Narratives of emotional events

· Emotional tone

· Figurative language and metaphor

· Repetition

· Imagery

· Connection with the audience

• • • 47 DEBRA DICKERSON

DEBRA DICKERSON

Who Shot Johnny? FROM THE NEW REPUBLIC

GIVEN MY LEVEL of political awareness, it was inevitable that I would come to view the everyday events of my life through the prism of politics and the national discourse. I read The Washington Post, The New &public, The New Yorker, Harper's, The Atlantic Monthly, The Nation, National Review, Black Enterprise, and Essence and wrote a weekly column for the Harvard Law School Record during my three years just ended there. I do this because I know that those of us who are not well-fed white guys in suits must not yield the debate to them, however well-intentioned or well-informed they may be. Accordingly, I am unrepentant and vocal about having gained admittance to Harvard through affirmative action; I am a feminist, stoic about my marriage chances as a welI-educated, thirty-six-year-old black woman who won't pretend to need help taking care of herself. My strength flags, though, in the face of the latest role assigned to my family in the national drama. On July 27, 1995, my sixteen-year-old nephew was shot and paralyzed.

Talking with friends in front of his house, Johnny saw a car he thought he recognized. He waved boisterously - his trademark throwing both arms in the air in a full-bodied, hip-hop Y. When he got no response, he and his friends sauntered down the walk to join a group loitering in front of an apartment building. The car followed. The driver got out, brandished a revolver, and fired into the air. Everyone scattered. Then he took aim and shot my running nephew in the back.

Johnny never lost consciousness. He lay in the road, trying to understand what had happened to him, why he couldn't get up.

Emotionlessly, he told the story again and again on demand, re- maining apologetically firm against all demands to divulge the missing details that would make sense of the shooting but obviously cast him in a bad light. Being black, male, and shot, he must ap- parently be involved with gangs or drugs. Probably both. Witnesses corroborate his version of events.

Nearly six months have passed since that phone call in the night and my nightmarish headlong drive from Boston to Charlotte. Mter twenty hours behind the wheel, I arrived haggard enough to reduce my mother to fresh tears and to find my nephew reassuring well-wishers with an eerie sang-froid.

I take the day shift in his hospital room; his mother and grand- mother, a clerk and cafeteria worker, respectively, alternate nights there on a cot. They don their uniforms the next day, gaunt after hours spent listening to Johnny moan in his sleep. How often must his subconscious replay those events and curse its host for saying hello without permission, for being carefree and young while a would-be murderer hefted the weight of his uselessness and failure like Jacob Marley's chains? How often must he watch himself lying stubbornly immobile on the pavement of his nightmares while the sound of running feet syncopate his attacker's taunts?

I spend these days beating him at gin rummy and Scrabble, holding a basin while he coughs up phlegm and crying in the cor- ridor while he catheterizes himself. There are children here much worse off than he. I should be grateful. The doctors can't, or won't, say whether he'll walk again.

I am at once repulsed and fascinated by the bullet, which re- mains lodged in his spine (having done all the damage it can do, the doctors say). The wound is undramatic - small, neat, and perfectly centered - an impossibly pink pit surrounded by an otherwise undisturbed expanse of mahogany. Johnny has asked me several times to describe it but politely declines to look in the mirror I hold for him.

Here on the pediatric rehab ward, Johnny speaks little, never cries, never complains, works diligently to become independent. He does whatever he is told; if two hours remain until the next pain pill, he waits quietly. Eyes bloodshot, hands gripping the bed rails. During the week of his intravenous feeding, when he was tormented by the primal need to masticate, he never asked for

49

Who Shot Johnny? 48 food. He just listened while we counted down the days for him and planned his favorite meals. Now required to dress himself unassisted, he does so without demur, rolling himself back and forth valiantly on the bed and shivering afterward, exhausted. He "ma'am "s and "sir"s everyone politely. Before his "accident," a sim- ple request to take out the trash could provoke a firestorm of teen- age attitude. We, the women who have raised him, have changed as well; we've finally come to appreciate those boxer-baring, over- sized pants we used to hate - it would be much more difficult to fit properly sized pants over his diaper.

He spends a lot of time tethered to rap music still loud enough to break my concentration as I read my many magazines. I hear him try to soundlessly mouth the obligatory "mothafuckers" over- laying the funereal dirge of the music tracks. I do not normally tolerate disrespectful music in my or my mother's presence, but if it distracts him now ...

'Johnny," I ask later, "do you still like gangster rap?" During the long pause I hear him think loudly, I'm paralyzed, Auntie, not stupid. "I mostly just listen to hip-hop," he says evasively into his Sports Illustrated.

Miserable though it is, time passes quickly here. We always seem to be jerking awake in our chairs just in time for the next pill, his every-other-night bowel program, the doctor's rounds. Harvard feels a galaxy away - the world revolves around Family Members Living with Spinal Cord Injury class, Johnny's urine output, and strategizing with my sister to find affordable, accessible housing. There is always another long-distance uncle in need of an update, another church member wanting to pray with us, orJohnny's little brother in need of some attention.

We Dickerson women are so constant a presence the ward nurses and cleaning staff call us by name and join us for cafeteria meals and cigarette breaks. At Johnny's birthday pizza party, they crack jokes and make fun of each other's husbands (there are no men here). I pass slices around and try not to think, Seventeen with a bullet.

Oddly, we feel little curiosity or specific anger toward the man who shot him. We have to remind ourselves to check in with the police. Even so, it feels pro forma, like sending in those $2 rebate

DEBRA DICKERSON

forms that come with new pantyhose: you know your request will fall into a deep, dark hole somewhere, but still, it's your duty to try. We push for an arrest because we owe it to Johnny and to ourselves as citizens. We don't think about it otherwise - our low expectations are too ingrained. A Harvard aunt notwithstanding, for people like Johnny, Marvin Gaye was right that only three things are sure: taxes, death, and trouble. At least it wasn't the second.

We rarely wonder about or discuss the brother who shot him because we already know everything about him. When the call came, my first thought was the same one I'd had when I'd heard about Rosa Parks's beating: a brother did it. A nonjob-having, middle-of-the-day malt-liquor-drinking, crotch-clutching, loud-talk- ing brother with many neglected children born of many forgotten women. He lives in his mother's basement with furniture rented at an astronomical interest rate, the exact amount of which he does not know. He has a car phone, an $80 monthly cable bill, and every possible phone feature but no savings. He steals Social Se- curity numbers from unsuspecting relatives and assumes their identities to acquire large 1V sets for which he will never pay. On the slim chance that he is brought to justice, he will have a color- ful criminal history and no coherent explanation to offer for his act. His family will raucously defend him and cry cover-up. Some liberal lawyer just like me will help him plea-bargain his way to yet another short stay in a prison pesthouse that will serve only to add another layer to the brother's sociopathology and formless, mind- less nihilism. We know him. We've known and feared him all our lives.

As a teenager, he called, "Hey, baby, gimme somma that boodie!" at us from car windows. Indignant at our lack of response, he followed up with, "Fuck you, then, 'ho!" He called me a "white- boy-lovin' nigger bitch oreo" for being in the gifted program and loving it. At twenty-seven, he got my seventeen-year-old sister preg- nant with Johnny and lost interest without ever informing her that he was married. He snatched my widowed mother's purse as she waited in predawn darkness for the bus to work and then broke into our house while she soldered on an assembly line. He chased all the small entrepreneurs from our neighborhood with his vio- lent thievery and put bars on our windows. He kept us from sitting

• • • Who Shot Johnny? 50

on our own front porch after dark and laid the foundation for our periodic bouts of self-hating anger and racial embarrassment. He made our neighborhood a ghetto. He is the poster fool behind the maddening community knowledge that there are still some black mothers who raise their daughters but merely love their sons. He and his cancerous carbon copies eclipse the vast majority of us who are not sociopaths and render us invisible. He is the Siamese twin who has died but cannot be separated from his living, vibrant sibling; which of us must attract more notice? We despise and disown this anomalous loser, but for many he is black America. We know him, we know that he is outside the fold, and we know that he will only get worse. What we didn't know is that, because of him, my little sister would one day be the latest hysterical black mother wailing over a fallen child on IV.

Alone, lying in the road bleeding and paralyzed but hideously conscious, Johnny had lain helpless as he watched his would- be murderer come to stand over him and offer this prophecy: "Betch'ou won't be doin' nomo' wavin', mothafucker."

Fuck you, asshole. He's fine from the waist up. You just can't do anything right, can you?

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.

Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com