Melissa Montesinos

Finance deals with leverage, banking or debt, capital markets, investments and money. It is used

in describing the general management of funds and the processes of acquiring funds. Finance is

categorized into major areas such as corporate finance, investments, financial institutions and

international finance.

The paper aims at outlining each of the outlined areas of finance and describes the relevant skills

required in becoming an effective professional in the field. Also, there is a comprehensive

description of the impact of technology, the economy and the persistent pandemic on careers in

the respective field of finance.

Corporate finance

This is the branch of finance that deals with how corporations deal with funding sources,

investment decisions and capital structuring. The aim of corporate finance in the operations of

organizations is maximization of shareholder’s value through short-term and long-term planning

and implementation of strategies. Corporate finance is mainly focused on specific areas such as

cost of capital, invested capital, operating flows and return on invested capital. In ensuring that

one understands the requirements of each of the areas outlined in corporate finance, there are

skills that are necessary for the corporate finance professional. One of the skills is a formal

accounting qualification which is highly applied in determining the appropriate cost of capital

that an organization or a company should use in its capital structure. Also, the professional

should have the skills to develop a budget for an organization based on projections or past data.

This is enhanced by the presence of interrelated skills such as financial reporting skills which

enable the professional to prepare statements based on the relevant financial and accounting

standards (Booth et al, 2020).

Investments

This refers to the area of finance that deals with allocation of resources with the expectations of

getting a return after some time in terms of profits or interests. In most cases the resources used

in investments include money and financial instruments. An investment is basically an asset that

is purchased with the hope that there will be generation of income or appreciation in value at

some point in future. Professionals in this field are normally the financial analysts. In enhancing

one’s effectiveness in the investment field, there are various skills that one should at equipping

themselves. One of the skills is information technology expertise in terms of computer literacy

among other areas. Also, one should have analytical skills which relate to the ability to collect

and analyze information and use the information in solving a problem at hand. Also, one should

have research skills as investments require one to have all the necessary data in making a certain

decision (Brown, 2021).

Financial Institutions

This field of finance deals with the entities or institutions where finance and related activities are

carried out. There are various financial institutions that are covered in finance. Among the

institutions include Central Banks which are the largest or most powerful banks in jurisdictions

or economies. Also, there are commercial banks, investment banks, brokerage firms, credit

unions among others. In becoming an effective professional in any financial effective, there are

common skills that one should focus on. One of the skills is numeracy skills which deal with the

ability to use, make interpretations and communicate mathematical information in solving

real-world problems. Organization and time management skills are also important skills as

financial institutions are based on compliance to schedules. In addition to the necessary skills is

team management as financial institutions are composed of teams from different fields in finance

(Murray, 2020).

International finance

This is one of the complex fields in finance which refers to the study of monetary interactions

that are carried out between two or more countries. Among the areas that are dealt with in

international finance include: foreign currency exchange rate and foreign direct investment. It is

an important field particularly with the increased globalization. There are various key skills

which are important in international finance. Among the skills include risk analysis where a

professional should have a great understanding of the economic and currency risks which are

mostly dealt with in comparing opportunities from different jurisdictions or countries. Also,

foreign exchange knowledge is necessary as international finance deals with more than one

currency (Booth et al, 2020).

Impact of technology on careers in finance

Technology has resulted into introduction of computerized financial modeling thus requiring

finance professionals to expand the IT skills and understand how to make corporate finance

models using information systems in finance. Technology has also contributed into development

of new careers in finance such as business information technology which deals with various

issues in finance which are operated through the information technology systems. Technology

has enhanced globalization which in turn has increased the demand for international finance

experts (Lohr, 2019).

Impact of economy on careers in finance

The careers in corporate finance are also affected by changes in the economy in that the economy

has a direct effect on the corporate entities. For instance, recessions in the economy result into

downsizing of corporations and financial institutions which forces the management to layoffs

some of the members of staff such as corporate finance officers.

Impact of Persistent pandemic on careers in finance

When a pandemic is persistent, the governments establish measures to reduce the spread of the

pandemic. One of the measures includes reducing overcrowding in financial institutions by both

the professionals as well as the customers. This results into the finance professionals changing

their places of work and they start working remotely other than their normal offices. Also, with

pandemic, financial institutions reduce their operations resulting into some finance professionals

being laid off (Ackerman, 2020).

Reference

Ackerman Andrew (2020). Fed Says Coronavirus Remains a Top U.S Financial Risk.

The Wall Street Journal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-says-coronavirus-remains-a-top-u-s-financial-risk-1160

4955856

Booth, L., Cleary, W. S., & Rakita, I. (2020). Introduction to corporate finance. John

Wiley & Sons.

Brown B. Paul (2021). Investing Made Simpler for Beginners and Everyone Else. The

New York Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/08/business/investing-made-simple-for-beginners-and

-everyone-else.html

Lohr Steve (2019). It Started with a Jolt. How new York Became a Tech Town. The New

York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/22/technology/nyc-tech-startups.html

Murray Seb (2020). Graduate with Tech and Finance Skills in High demand. Financial

Times. https://www.ft.com/content/6c7001ec-70e3-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5

VM Scanner Background Report

<Student Name>

CMIT 421 <Section #xxxx> Threat Management and Vulnerability Assessment

<Date>

Introduction

Provide an introduction that includes what you intend to cover in the background paper. Ensure you are specific and define your purpose clearly.

Part 1: Nessus Vulnerability Report Analysis

In this section, analyze and interpret the results of the report to give your boss a clear picture of the Mercury USA’s potential vulnerabilities.

As you analyze the report, address the following points:

· Is it appropriate to distribute the report as is, or do you need to interpret the report, attach meaning before sending to management? Explain why or why not.

· What is your overall impression of the tool’s output? Is it easy to interpret, well-organized, include enough detail, too much detail?

· Does the tool provide enough reporting detail for you as the analyst to focus on the relevant vulnerabilities for Mercury USA?

· Name the three most important vulnerabilities in this system for Mercury USA. Why are they the most critical?

· How does the report provide enough information to address and remediate the three most important vulnerabilities?

Take Note: Judy has asked you to provide a screenshot to help her understand what the Nessus report looks like.

Screenshot Instructions

1. Open Lab 4.5.x, “Conducting Vulnerability Scans” within the uCertify Pearson CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst (CySA+) content  

1. After Step 25, click on the scan “General Scan”

1. Click the Report button dropdown and choose HTML

1. In the “Generate HTML Report” dialog, click the Generate Report button  

1. Open the report from the browser’s download bar at the bottom of the screen  

1. Click the Show Details button

1. Take a full window screenshot that includes the date/time of the report and the date/time area of the VM’s taskbar (refer to the example below)

Note: This portion of the background paper also helps determine that your submission is unique. Thus, you must include the specific screenshot as seen below or your project will not be accepted.

<insert your screenshot here>

Part 2: The Business Case

Keep these issues in mind as you address the two questions below:

· Think back to the video from Mercury USA’s CEO. What were his main areas of concern?

· What is the industry/function of the organization?

· What kinds of data might be important to the organization?

What is your assessment of the Mercury USA’s overall current security posture? What information in the vulnerability scans supports your assessment?

Based on the vulnerabilities present in the reports and the information available about them, what threats might an adversary or black hat hacker try to use against the organization to exfiltrate data or hold it for ransom?

Part 3: Nessus Purchase Recommendation

State your case for your recommendation of the Nessus commercial vulnerability scanner. Be sure to address the following questions:

· Do you think the overall presentation and scoring features are adequate for technical professionals?

· How can this tool help Mercury USA comply with regulatory and standards requirements?

· What is the cost to license the tool? Does the usability, support, and efficacy of the tool warrant the cost?

· Do you think the Nessus report is understandable/suitable for management? Explain why or why not.

· Would you recommend that Mercury USA purchase the tool? Provide your rationale for this recommendation.

Conclusion

Provide a conclusion of at least a paragraph summarizing your analysis of the Nessus vulnerability report, your purchase recommendation, and why your purchase recommendation is beneficial for employees, management, and the organization.

References

Use in-text citations in the body of your memorandum as appropriate. Add all sources you used here. This example citation uses IEEE style. Use a style of your choice or ask your instructor for clarification. When using the associated course content, ensure you cite to the chapter level. An example IEEE citation is provided below for your reference.

[1] "Chapter 5: Implementing an Information Security Vulnerability Management Process", Pearson CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst (CySA+), 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucertify.com/. [Accessed: 28-Apr-2020].

Nessus Essentials

Nessus Report

Report generated by Nessus™

My Basic Network Scan

Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:12:48 Pacific Standard Time
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Hosts Executive SummaryExpand All | Collapse All
192.168.1.10
0 1 1 0 22
Critical High Medium Low Info
Show Details
Severity CVSS Plugin Name
High 9.3 97833 MS17-010: Security Update for Microsoft Windows SMB Server (4013389) (ETERNALBLUE) (ETERNALCHAMPION) (ETERNALROMANCE) (ETERNALSYNERGY) (WannaCry) (EternalRocks) (Petya) (uncredentialed check)
Medium 5.0 57608 SMB Signing not required
Info N/A 45590 Common Platform Enumeration (CPE)
Info N/A 10736 DCE Services Enumeration
Info N/A 54615 Device Type
Info N/A 35716 Ethernet Card Manufacturer Detection
Info N/A 86420 Ethernet MAC Addresses
Info N/A 12053 Host Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Resolution
Info N/A 117886 Local Checks Not Enabled (info)
Info N/A 10394 Microsoft Windows SMB Log In Possible
Info N/A 10785 Microsoft Windows SMB NativeLanManager Remote System Information Disclosure
Info N/A 26917 Microsoft Windows SMB Registry : Nessus Cannot Access the Windows Registry
Info N/A 11011 Microsoft Windows SMB Service Detection
Info N/A 100871 Microsoft Windows SMB Versions Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 106716 Microsoft Windows SMB2 and SMB3 Dialects Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 11219 Nessus SYN scanner
Info N/A 19506 Nessus Scan Information
Info N/A 110723 No Credentials Provided
Info N/A 11936 OS Identification
Info N/A 96982 Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol Version 1 Enabled (uncredentialed check)
Info N/A 25220 TCP/IP Timestamps Supported
Info N/A 10287 Traceroute Information
Info N/A 20094 VMware Virtual Machine Detection
Info N/A 10150 Windows NetBIOS / SMB Remote Host Information Disclosure
Hide Details 192.168.1.25
0 1 2 2 43
Critical High Medium Low Info
Show Details
Severity CVSS Plugin Name
High 7.5 42411 Microsoft Windows SMB Shares Unprivileged Access
Medium 5.0 57608 SMB Signing not required
Medium 4.3 90317 SSH Weak Algorithms Supported
Low 2.6 70658 SSH Server CBC Mode Ciphers Enabled
Low 2.6 71049 SSH Weak MAC Algorithms Enabled
Info N/A 10114 ICMP Timestamp Request Remote Date Disclosure
Info N/A 18261 Apache Banner Linux Distribution Disclosure
Info N/A 48204 Apache HTTP Server Version
Info N/A 39519 Backported Security Patch Detection (FTP)
Info N/A 39520 Backported Security Patch Detection (SSH)
Info N/A 39521 Backported Security Patch Detection (WWW)
Info N/A 45590 Common Platform Enumeration (CPE)
Info N/A 54615 Device Type
Info N/A 35716 Ethernet Card Manufacturer Detection
Info N/A 86420 Ethernet MAC Addresses
Info N/A 10092 FTP Server Detection
Info N/A 43111 HTTP Methods Allowed (per directory)
Info N/A 10107 HTTP Server Type and Version
Info N/A 24260 HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Information
Info N/A 117886 Local Checks Not Enabled (info)
Info N/A 17651 Microsoft Windows SMB : Obtains the Password Policy
Info N/A 10394 Microsoft Windows SMB Log In Possible
Info N/A 10859 Microsoft Windows SMB LsaQueryInformationPolicy Function SID Enumeration
Info N/A 10785 Microsoft Windows SMB NativeLanManager Remote System Information Disclosure
Info N/A 11011 Microsoft Windows SMB Service Detection
Info N/A 60119 Microsoft Windows SMB Share Permissions Enumeration
Info N/A 10395 Microsoft Windows SMB Shares Enumeration
Info N/A 100871 Microsoft Windows SMB Versions Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 106716 Microsoft Windows SMB2 and SMB3 Dialects Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 11219 Nessus SYN scanner
Info N/A 19506 Nessus Scan Information
Info N/A 110723 No Credentials Provided
Info N/A 11936 OS Identification
Info N/A 10860 SMB Use Host SID to Enumerate Local Users
Info N/A 70657 SSH Algorithms and Languages Supported
Info N/A 10881 SSH Protocol Versions Supported
Info N/A 10267 SSH Server Type and Version Information
Info N/A 25240 Samba Server Detection
Info N/A 104887 Samba Version
Info N/A 96982 Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol Version 1 Enabled (uncredentialed check)
Info N/A 22964 Service Detection
Info N/A 25220 TCP/IP Timestamps Supported
Info N/A 10287 Traceroute Information
Info N/A 66293 Unix Operating System on Extended Support
Info N/A 20094 VMware Virtual Machine Detection
Info N/A 10150 Windows NetBIOS / SMB Remote Host Information Disclosure
Info N/A 66717 mDNS Detection (Local Network)
Info N/A 52703 vsftpd Detection
Hide Details 192.168.1.30
5 1 12 2 57
Critical High Medium Low Info
Show Details
Severity CVSS Plugin Name
Critical 10.0 51988 Bind Shell Backdoor Detection
Critical 10.0 32314 Debian OpenSSH/OpenSSL Package Random Number Generator Weakness
Critical 10.0 32321 Debian OpenSSH/OpenSSL Package Random Number Generator Weakness (SSL check)
Critical 10.0 11356 NFS Exported Share Information Disclosure
Critical 10.0 33850 Unix Operating System Unsupported Version Detection
High 7.1 20007 SSL Version 2 and 3 Protocol Detection
Medium 6.4 51192 SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
Medium 6.4 57582 SSL Self-Signed Certificate
Medium 6.1 104743 TLS Version 1.0 Protocol Detection
Medium 5.0 11213 HTTP TRACE / TRACK Methods Allowed
Medium 5.0 42256 NFS Shares World Readable
Medium 5.0 57608 SMB Signing not required
Medium 5.0 15901 SSL Certificate Expiry
Medium 5.0 45411 SSL Certificate with Wrong Hostname
Medium 5.0 42873 SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported (SWEET32)
Medium 4.3 90317 SSH Weak Algorithms Supported
Medium 4.3 65821 SSL RC4 Cipher Suites Supported (Bar Mitzvah)
Medium 4.3 78479 SSLv3 Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption Vulnerability (POODLE)
Low 2.6 70658 SSH Server CBC Mode Ciphers Enabled
Low 2.6 71049 SSH Weak MAC Algorithms Enabled
Info N/A 10114 ICMP Timestamp Request Remote Date Disclosure
Info N/A 10223 RPC portmapper Service Detection
Info N/A 21186 AJP Connector Detection
Info N/A 18261 Apache Banner Linux Distribution Disclosure
Info N/A 48204 Apache HTTP Server Version
Info N/A 84574 Backported Security Patch Detection (PHP)
Info N/A 39520 Backported Security Patch Detection (SSH)
Info N/A 39521 Backported Security Patch Detection (WWW)
Info N/A 45590 Common Platform Enumeration (CPE)
Info N/A 10028 DNS Server BIND version Directive Remote Version Detection
Info N/A 11002 DNS Server Detection
Info N/A 72779 DNS Server Version Detection
Info N/A 35371 DNS Server hostname.bind Map Hostname Disclosure
Info N/A 54615 Device Type
Info N/A 35716 Ethernet Card Manufacturer Detection
Info N/A 86420 Ethernet MAC Addresses
Info N/A 10092 FTP Server Detection
Info N/A 10107 HTTP Server Type and Version
Info N/A 24260 HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Information
Info N/A 11156 IRC Daemon Version Detection
Info N/A 117886 Local Checks Not Enabled (info)
Info N/A 11011 Microsoft Windows SMB Service Detection
Info N/A 106716 Microsoft Windows SMB2 and SMB3 Dialects Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 10437 NFS Share Export List
Info N/A 11219 Nessus SYN scanner
Info N/A 19506 Nessus Scan Information
Info N/A 110723 No Credentials Provided
Info N/A 11936 OS Identification
Info N/A 50845 OpenSSL Detection
Info N/A 48243 PHP Version Detection
Info N/A 118224 PostgreSQL STARTTLS Support
Info N/A 26024 PostgreSQL Server Detection
Info N/A 22227 RMI Registry Detection
Info N/A 11111 RPC Services Enumeration
Info N/A 53335 RPC portmapper (TCP)
Info N/A 10263 SMTP Server Detection
Info N/A 70657 SSH Algorithms and Languages Supported
Info N/A 10881 SSH Protocol Versions Supported
Info N/A 10267 SSH Server Type and Version Information
Info N/A 56984 SSL / TLS Versions Supported
Info N/A 45410 SSL Certificate 'commonName' Mismatch
Info N/A 10863 SSL Certificate Information
Info N/A 70544 SSL Cipher Block Chaining Cipher Suites Supported
Info N/A 21643 SSL Cipher Suites Supported
Info N/A 62563 SSL Compression Methods Supported
Info N/A 57041 SSL Perfect Forward Secrecy Cipher Suites Supported
Info N/A 22964 Service Detection
Info N/A 17975 Service Detection (GET request)
Info N/A 11153 Service Detection (HELP Request)
Info N/A 25220 TCP/IP Timestamps Supported
Info N/A 11819 TFTP Daemon Detection
Info N/A 10287 Traceroute Information
Info N/A 11154 Unknown Service Detection: Banner Retrieval
Info N/A 20094 VMware Virtual Machine Detection
Info N/A 11424 WebDAV Detection
Info N/A 10150 Windows NetBIOS / SMB Remote Host Information Disclosure
Info N/A 52703 vsftpd Detection
Hide Details 192.168.1.100
0 0 1 0 26
Critical High Medium Low Info
Show Details
Severity CVSS Plugin Name
Medium 5.0 57608 SMB Signing not required
Info N/A 45590 Common Platform Enumeration (CPE)
Info N/A 10736 DCE Services Enumeration
Info N/A 54615 Device Type
Info N/A 35716 Ethernet Card Manufacturer Detection
Info N/A 86420 Ethernet MAC Addresses
Info N/A 10092 FTP Server Detection
Info N/A 43111 HTTP Methods Allowed (per directory)
Info N/A 10107 HTTP Server Type and Version
Info N/A 12053 Host Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Resolution
Info N/A 24260 HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Information
Info N/A 117886 Local Checks Not Enabled (info)
Info N/A 10785 Microsoft Windows SMB NativeLanManager Remote System Information Disclosure
Info N/A 11011 Microsoft Windows SMB Service Detection
Info N/A 100871 Microsoft Windows SMB Versions Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 106716 Microsoft Windows SMB2 and SMB3 Dialects Supported (remote check)
Info N/A 11219 Nessus SYN scanner
Info N/A 19506 Nessus Scan Information
Info N/A 110723 No Credentials Provided
Info N/A 11936 OS Identification
Info N/A 96982 Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol Version 1 Enabled (uncredentialed check)
Info N/A 22964 Service Detection
Info N/A 25220 TCP/IP Timestamps Supported
Info N/A 10287 Traceroute Information
Info N/A 20094 VMware Virtual Machine Detection
Info N/A 11422 Web Server Unconfigured - Default Install Page Present
Info N/A 10150 Windows NetBIOS / SMB Remote Host Information Disclosure
Hide Details © 2020 Tenable™, Inc. All rights reserved.

Ratio Analysis

Name

Affiliate Institution

Date

Ratio Analysis

Financial analysis is crucial to the overall decision-making of the various entities. Concerning the telecommunications industry, this paper presents the ratio analysis of the Telus, Teleperformance, and the Rodgers Communication Limited both traded in the New York Stock Exchange. Telecommunication companies provide services and therefore some ratio classifications will not be relevant. It is this unique nature that has justified the choice of the above companies.

The financial ratios, the reference in this paper fall under the profitability, leverage, market values, activity, and liquidity classifications. For analysis, the period 2018 through 2020 was chosen. Regarding profitability, the financial ratios measure the company’s ability to generate revenue. These ratios indicate the ability to generate the income above its assets. In this category, the return on assets values showed that the trends for the Telus, Tele performance, and the Rodgers Company were on a generally declining trend. This implies that the companies’ returns regarding the assets invested were decreasing over time. From appendix 1, 2019 was the worst year as in this period all the companies had the lowest Return on Assets value.

Under profitability still is the Return on Equity values. The return on equity is computed by dividing the net income by the shareholder’s equity (Mubashir & Bin, 2017). In this category, the Tele performance company had an increasing trend that made it ahead of its counterparts. Another ratio classification is the liquidity class that measures the ability to meet obligations as and when they fall due. For this classification, there is the current ratio that is computed by dividing the current assets by the current liabilities. In this, classification, 2019 was a better year across the three companies. For companies’ comparison, the Telus Company performed better than the other companies.

Ratio performance in terms of activity was measured by the accounts receivable turnover ratio. The accounts receivable turnover ratio measures the average accounts receivables by the net credit sales. The figures computed (refer to appendix 1), indicating an overall increasing trend with 2019 reporting better performance than the other companies. The other financial ratios classification is the market value ratios. In this class will be the price-to-earnings ratio. The values increased over time for the Telus, Rodgers, and the Tele performance companies. The increasing performance indicated improving market value position which is proper for decision making. The companies under analysis had increasing leverage ratios which imply increasing debt.

The Teleperformance Company performed well in the leverage aspect in that it had lower performance ratios. The company had higher profitability and market value performance. This exceeded my expectations. On computing the financial ratios, volatility in the trends is something I learned and this made it difficult to assess the impact in some instances. Comparison against the other companies in the long term made it possible to refer. The experience I have had in the project will equip me with the skills to analyze future projects and improve my analytical capabilities.

With a 500,000 dollars allocation, considering the Telus, Tele Performance, and Rodgers companies. Allocation will be done using the profitability indices, the profitability indices are as shown in appendix 2. From appendix 2, the profitability index of the Tele performance company was 10.26 and was the highest. The Telus and Rodgers companies reported 0.3153 and 2.2382 respectively. More allocation will therefore go to Teleperformance, then Rodgers.

References

Mubashir, A., & Bin Tariq, D. (2017). Application of financial ratios as a firm's key performance and failure indicator: Literature review. Mubashir, Afeera and Bin Tariq, Yasir, Application of Financial Ratios as a Firm's Key Performance and Failure Indicator: Literature Review, Journal of Global Economics, Management and Business Research, 8(1), 18-27.

Appendix

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Profitability Index

Teleperformance company

Telus Company

Rodgers Company

PV of inflows

1611000

334000

5797000

PV of outflows

157000

1059000

2590000

PI

10.261146

0.315392

2.238223938

Ratio TypeRatioRodgers Company

201820192020201820192020201820192020

ProfitabilityReturn on

Assets

6.566.016.265.114.922.976.85123.71663.9549

Return on

Equity

16.3315.1216.7217.3216.7810.7310.33235.06684.8974

Liquidity

Current

ratio

1.1092.51.81.232.51.344.53244.63064.2523

Activity

Accounts

receivable

turnover

ratio

4.734.524.787.457.446.795.9087.0895.8409

Market value

Price-to-

earnings

ratio

26.3831.9255.4914.4916.8427.9115.7616.0316.68

LeverageDebt ratio2.372.662.693.223.63.58

4.5294.6314.253

Teleperformance companyTelus Company

Sheet1

Ratio Type Ratio Teleperformance company Telus Company Rodgers Company
2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
Profitability Return on Assets 6.56 6.01 6.26 5.11 4.92 2.97 6.8512 3.7166 3.9549
Return on Equity 16.33 15.12 16.72 17.32 16.78 10.73 10.3323 5.0668 4.8974
Liquidity Current ratio 1.109 2.5 1.8 1.23 2.5 1.34 4.5324 4.6306 4.2523
Activity Accounts receivable turnover ratio 4.73 4.52 4.78 7.45 7.44 6.79 5.908 7.089 5.8409
Market value Price-to-earnings ratio 26.38 31.92 55.49 14.49 16.84 27.91 15.76 16.03 16.68
Leverage Debt ratio 2.37 2.66 2.69 3.22 3.6 3.58 4.529 4.631 4.253
Profitability Index Teleperformance company Telus Company Rodgers Company
PV of inflows 1611000 334000 5797000
PV of outflows 157000 1059000 2590000
PI 10.2611464968 0.3153918791 2.2382239382

Sheet2

Sheet3

Previous Next

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.

Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com