MGT/362 v3

Title

ABC/123 vX

Page 2 of 2

Scenario: Jack’s Dilemma

Jack White is the newly appointed general manager of the pet food division of Strickland Corporation. He has completed a strategic review that has convinced him that the division needs to undergo rapid and substantial change in a number of areas, given the recent strategic moves of key competitors.

Although Jack is new, he is familiar enough with the company to know that there will be significant resistance to the changes from a number of quarters. He also suspects that some of this resistance will come from people with the capacity to act in ways that could seriously impede successful change.

Jack reflects on the situation. He believes that it is important to introduce the proposed changes soon, but he also recognizes that if he acts too quickly, he’ll have virtually no time to have a dialogue with staff about the proposed changes, much less involve them in any significant way.

One option is to act speedily and to make it clear that “consequences” will follow for anyone not cooperating. He certainly has the power to act on such a threat. The risk, Jack knows, is that even if no one shows outright resistance, there’s a big difference between not cooperating and acting in a manner that reflects commitment. He knows that he needs the cooperation of key groups of staff, and that sometimes “minimum-level compliance” can be as unhelpful as resistance when it comes to implementing change. “But maybe I’m exaggerating this problem,” he thinks to himself. “Maybe I should just go ahead with the change. If people don’t like it, they can leave. If they stay, they’ll come around.”

But Jack is not sure. He considers another option. Maybe he should spend more time on building up support at least among key groups of managers and staff, if not more broadly across the organization. “Maybe,” he reflects, “the need to change is not quite as immediate as I think. I just know that I’d feel a whole lot better if this consultation could happen quickly.”

Copyright 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.

Copyright 2020 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Class Profile

Student Name

English Language Learner

Socioeconomic

Status

Ethnicity

Gender

IEP

Service Need of IEP

Year in School

Reading

Performance Level

Math Performance

Level

Andy

No

Low SES

White

Male

Academic

Reading Comprehension

10

Two years below grade level

One year below grade level

Beth

No

Mid SES

White

Female

Behavior/Emotional

Task Completion/ Executive Functioning Disorder

9

One year above grade level

Two years below grade level

Christy

No

Mid SES

White

Female

Emotional Disturbance

Social Anxiety

10

At grade level

Two years below grade level

Drew

No

Low SES

White

Male

Academic

Dyscalculia

10

At grade level

Three years below grade level

Ella

No

Mid SES

White

Female

Academic/Behavior

Calculations/ODD

10

Grade level

Two years below grade level

Emma

Yes

Low SES

White

Female

Emotional Disturbance

Depression

9

At grade level

Two years below grade level

Lebron

No

Mid SES

African American

Male

Academic

Dyslexia

10

Two years below grade level

One year below grade level

Manuel

Yes

Low SES

Hispanic

Male

Academic

Computation

10

One year below grade level

Two years below grade level

Sarah

No

Mid SES

White

Female

Academic/Behavior

Nonverbal learning disability

9

Two years below grade level

Two years below grade level

Thomas

ELL

Low SES

Hispanic

Male

Academic/Behavior

ASD/Communication

10

Two years below grade level

Two years below grade level

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.

Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com