MGT315 Midterm Assignment

Deadline: Wednesday March 10th 11.59pm

Worth: 30%

Length: Minimum 1500 words

Bibliography: 4 references minimum

QUESTION

Using one of the following case studies

(i) Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster

(ii) The actions of Chuck Blazer within FIFA corruption

(iii) The Ebay 2020 CyberStalking scandal

In resolving the ethical dilemma(s) in your chosen case study, apply:

a. Utilitarianism / Best Outcome model

b. The Rights Model (applicable why/why not)

c. Your own opinion

Use the file Phantom Expenses under “Business Ethics” notes to help guide your answer.

Grading Rubric

Any questions please contact me.

Thanks,

Dr. Marie

2

Essay/Exam Answer Evaluation Form

Student Name: _________________ ______________________________

Student No: __________________ Question/Topic: ______________

5 4 3 2 1

(high) (low)

1. Task      Does not respond to

Addressed title title sufficiently

2. Critical Thinking      Uses generalisations

Original thinking, makes & reproduces

links with other topics summarises texts

3. Analysis      Shallow, descriptive

Deep &insightful, takes things at face

recognises complexity value

4. Argument &      Rambling, incoherent

Structure vague, not developed

Clearly stated, coherent effectively, no clear

logically developed, well structure

organised

5. Support      Questionable or

Appropriate & accurate irrelevant evidence

evidence for argument for argument

6. Ethics

Concepts      Little evidence of

Clear understanding understanding

& Relevant usage

7. Reading      No evidence of

Evidence of reading reading or

knowledge of course knowledge of course

material material

8. Sources &      Unacknowledged

Referencing sources, poor

Adequate acknowledgement bibliographical list

of sources, ideas, competent

bibliography

9. Presentation &      Untidy difficult to

Style read, awkward

Legible, well set out phrasing, repetitive

Fluent, clear, precise

Grade