Running_head_CYBERBULLYING

Running head: CYBERBULLYING 1

CYBERBULLYING 6

Cyberbullying and the First Amendment

Jane Doe

July 28, 2016

Cyberbullying and the First Amendment

All papers should have an introductory paragraph that provides background on the subject you are going to write about in the paper. I recommend finding a current event, perhaps an article where a student committed suicide after having been the target of cyberbullying. A good approach follows this line: Tell them what you are going to tell them (introduction), Tell them (body of paper), and Tell them what you told them (Conclusion). The introduction must contain a thesis statement previewing the paper. An examination of Minford School District’s school board policy as well as the faculty and student handbooks in addition to the relevant sections of the Ohio Revised Code followed by a review of the First Amendment arguments the student who is charged with cyberbullying might make, and the First Amendment responses based on case law the school district could argue, will provide insight into the issue of cyberbullying. (This is just an example off the top of my head). (Another approach for the purpose statement could be: Having been notified that a student in your class has been subjected to bullying through another classmate's Facebook page, a discussion of steps required by (enter your state's name)"s statutes, (enter your school district's name)'s school board policies as well as the student handbook, will provide a basis for examining any First Amendment arguments that the bullying has raised, and a discussion of the school district’s First Amendment argumentative responses consistent with the cases in the assigned readings.)

State Statutes and District Policies on Cyberbullying

Paragraph one should explain how the school district policy that you are examining addresses cyberbullying. You should examine the district’s policy, the faculty handbook, and the student handbook. Make sure that you are correctly providing in-text citations to these sources.

In a separate paragraph, you should examine your state’s laws on cyberbullying. (We looked these up in one of the DQs this week). The question you should answer after reviewing each of the above are what steps that a faculty member should take based on the laws and policies examined. Another issue to examine might be if the policy differentiates between cyberbullying that occurs out of school and cyberbullying that occurs during school. Remember to refer back to the facts of the specific scenario as you examine each of these laws or policies. Citations to sources should be used throughout the paper. Transition sentence into the next section of the paper goes here. Examples: Having examined the Minford Local School District’s policy, the faculty handbook, the student handbook, and the Ohio Revised Code, this paper will now look at the First Amendment arguments the student who is charged with cyberbullying might make.

First Amendment Arguments of Student Charged With Cyberbullying

This section should discuss specifically the First Amendment arguments that the student who committed the alleged cyberbullying could make. See DQ threads for a couple of research articles to use as the basis for your own research. Questions you should answer would be are there Supreme Court cases or state cases that address the issue of cyberbullying. Another issue to examine might be any current event articles that examine the issue of cyberbullying. For instance, there are cases that have dealt with cyberbullying at the state level after students committed suicide as a result of being targeted by another student. Citations to sources should be used throughout the paper. Case law should be used to support your position. Transition sentence into the next section of the paper goes here. (See example under previous section).

School District’s First Amendment Responses

This section should examine First Amendment arguments that have been made in cases involving cyberbullying. Typically, the school board will be the defendant in these cases, but there are cases where criminal charges were filed against the alleged student committing cyberbullying. You will want to argue only the school board’s responses in this section. Transition sentence into the next section of the paper goes here. (See example under first section of outline).

Conclusion

Your conclusion should summarize the main points of the paper. The conclusion should never add new material to the paper. The conclusion should be the “Tell them what you told them” section of the paper. I typically use my thesis statement as my guide to what I need to include in my conclusion.

References

I have included a variety of sample references to help you with your formatting. These do not apply to the paper, but are simply examples.

34 CFR Parts 600 and 668, Program integrity: Gainful employment; Proposed rule (2014).

Abelman, R., Dalessandro, A., Janstova, P., & Snyder-Suhy, S. (2007). Institutional vision at proprietary schools: Advising for profit. NCADA Journal, 27(2), 9-27.

Abernathy, P. (2014, October 30). Statement on final gainful employment regulations. Retrieved from The Institute for College Access & Success: http://www.ticas.org/pub_view.php?idx=958

Aud, S.; Hussar, W.; Planty, M.; Snyder, T.; Bianco, K.; Fox, M.; Frohlich, L.; Kemp, J.; Drake, L. (2010). The condition of education 2010. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.

Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Bandell, B. (2014, October 2). Owner of for-profit college arrested for theft of federal aid. Retrieved from South Florida Business Journal: http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/news/2014/10/02/owner-of-for-profit-college-arrested-for-theft-of.html

Chase, T. (2010). A crisis is a terrible thing to waste. Economic Development Journal, 9(3), 27-35.

Clark, J. B. (2011, May). The real deal on for-profit colleges. Kiplinger's Personal Finance, pp. 64-68.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Horne v. Flores, 129 S. Ct. 2579 (2009)

Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974).

Plyer v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).

Assessment item 1

Understanding the Problem

Value: 10%

Submission method options

Alternative submission method

Task

Background:

The Commonwealth Government of Australia is launching ‘My Health Record’ a secure online summary of an individual’s health information.

Available to all Australians, My Health Record is an electronic summary of an individual’s key health information, drawn from their existing records and is designed to be integrated into existing local clinical systems.

The ‘My Health Record’ is driven by the need for the Health Industry to continue a process of reform to drive efficiencies into the health care system, improve the quality of patient care, whilst reducing several issues that were apparent from the lack of important information that is shared about patients e.g. reducing the rate of hospital admissions due to issues with prescribed medications. This reform is critical to address the escalating costs of healthcare that become unsustainable in the medium to long term.

Individuals will control what goes into their My Health Record, and who is allowed to access it. An individual’s My Health Record allows them and their doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers to view and share the individual’s health information to provide the best possible care.

*Please Note: This is a real project that has already been implemented, however, for this assessment you are to write your answer as if the project is in its’ the early stages. There is wide variety of information that can be referenced on this topic.

Complete the Following

You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed, ‘My Health Record’, your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project.

Currently funding is being sought to build the ‘My Health Record’ system. We will assume that the funding has been approved and that you are the business systems analyst assigned to the project.

You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains:

· Problem

· Capabilities

· Benefits

Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions.

Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lecturer in the class or by notification in the subject site.

Rationale

This assignment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:

· the context of an information system;

· the processes in systems analysis;

· the approaches in systems analysis

Marking criteria

Level Attained Criteria	STANDARDS
	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Fail
1. Content of the Vision Document Maximum 4 Marks	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.	Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.	Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.	Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
2. Clarity of expression and presentation of response Maximum 3 Marks	Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.	Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors. Significantly exceeded or fell short of the 3 page guide.	Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors. Ignored length requirements completely.
3. Referencing and Citation Maximum 3 Marks	Referencing is consistently accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. At least 5 references provided.	Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text. At least 4 references provided.	Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. At least 3 references provided.	Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. At least 2 references provided.	Referencing is absent/unsystematic.

Presentation

Your answer should be a report approx. 3 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of the page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.

Requirements

For this assessment you are required to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu . In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6

Assessment item 2

Requirements Gathering

Value: 30%

Submission method options

Alternative submission method

Task

Background

Refer to background information provided in Assessment 1 regarding the Commonwealth Government ‘My Health Record’ project.

Complete the Following

Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.

Consider that funding has been approved for a project to build a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told, and give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. You are the business systems analyst assigned to the project, you will need to produce:

Stakeholder map

· Draw stakeholder role names on a stakeholder map with 4 quadrants, Internal-Operation, Internal-Executive, External-Operation, External-Executive

· For each stakeholder, describe why they have an interest in the project.

Questionnaire

Create one questionnaire that you would send to one stakeholder group with an aim to help you identify further details about the environment, the problem area and/or how the system would operate to help solve the problem.

· Identify which stakeholder you are going to send the questionnaire to

· Write an introduction statement that would go with the questionnaire explaining the purpose of the questionnaire

· Write 10 questions, either open and/or closed ended questions

· This should be written as a questionnaire that could be distributed

· Only write the questions, you should not write the answers

Use Case diagram and descriptions

· Draw a use case model for the information system

· Write brief Use Case description for each Use Case in the diagram

· Write one fully developed Use Case description for one of the important Use Cases identified. Select an important Use Case that is key part of the system, not a basic simple Use Case.

Rationale

This assessment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:

· apply stakeholder analysis for of an information system;

· describe and apply requirements gathering techniques;

· define functional requirements

Marking criteria

Criteria	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (DI)	Credit (CR)	Pass (PS)	Fail (FL)
1.Stakeholder map Maximum 5 Marks	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.	Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholders.	Demonstrates understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Lists Stakeholders.	Has not demonstrated understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate.
2.Questionnaire Maximum 5 Marks	10 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material.	7 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material.	5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material.	3 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts.	1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
3.Functional Requirements Maximum 16 Marks	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.	Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references Maximum 4 Marks	Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.	Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors.	Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors.

Presentation

Your answer should be approx. 5 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.

Requirements

If any references are required, ensure to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu . In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6

Assessment item 3

Requirements Report

Value: 30%

Submission method options

Alternative submission method

Task

Further Background

Refer to background information provided in Assessment 1 regarding the Commonwealth Government ‘My Health Record’ project.

The project is considering cloud based solutions which should be investigated. Consider various aspects of cloud based solutions such as; data security, which includes data ownership (by Department of Health, the young person, medical professionals, the Emergency Department etc). As well as other relevant aspects of cloud solutions.

Complete the Following

Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.

Non-Functional Requirements

· This sets out the critical system qualities, system interfaces, user interface requirements, and system constraints.

· Use to ‘FURPS+’ acronym as reference, and ensure you at cover the non-functional aspects of the acronym, Usability, Reliability, Performance and Security.

Review of cloud based.

A review of strengths and weaknesses of cloud based solutions. Taking into consideration the environment which the solution would be deployed.

SDLC Approach

Write brief description of the Pros and Cons to approaching the project using the ‘Predictive’ SDLC, then the Pros and Cons to approach the project as ‘Adaptive’ SDLC. Then recommend either Predictive or Adaptive to the SDLC for the project and briefly describe why.

Rationale

This assignment is intended to develop and test your ability to research information system relevant issues. As well as develop requirement information. Also to consider the appropriate approach depending on criteria of Information System solution.

Marking criteria

CRITERIA	STANDARDS
	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Fail
1.Non-Functional Requirements Maximum 10 Marks	Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.	Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.	Specifies the main qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.	Specifies some of the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.	Poorly specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
2.Review of cloud based solution Maximum 8 Marks	Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions. As well as apply indepth understanding of the environment that the solution would be used in. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.	Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.	Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.	Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.	Strengths and weaknesses are poorly expressed. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
3. SDLC Approach Maximum 8 marks	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.	Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.	Demonstrates clear understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.	Discusses the SDLC approach. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.	Poor discussion of SDLC approach. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references Maximum 4 Marks	Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organised.	Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organised.	Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate.	Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors.	Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors.

Presentation

Your answer should be approx. 7 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations.

Requirements

blog16

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.