RSM802 Week 6 Lab Instructions
Methodology
IMPORTANT: Follow the template below. The text in blue are instructions and should NOT be included in your assignment. Please read all instructions carefully.
Hypothesis
Write a good Alternative H1 and Null Hypothesis Ho for this experiment below.
H1
H0
Variables
Identify the variables in the spaces below.
IV
Identify the Independent Variable(s) Be concise on what you call the IV (one or two words).
Type of IV
Identify whether the variable is categorical (nominal or ordinal) and identify the categories or if the scale is continuous (ratio or interval scale). If there are more than one IVs, repeat sequence IV, Type of IV.
DV
Identify the Dependent Variable(s). Be concise on what you call the DV (one or two words).
Type of DV
Identify whether the variable is categorical (nominal or ordinal) and identify the categories or if the scale is continuous (ratio or interval scale). If there are more than one DVs, repeat sequence DV, Type of DV.
CV
Identify any possible CoVariate. These must be variables that were collected in the study. Be concise on what you call the CV (one or two words).
Type of CV
Identify whether the variable is categorical (nominal or ordinal) and identify the categories or if the scale is continuous (ratio or interval scale). If there are more than one CVs, repeat sequence CV, Type of CV.
Design
Report the design of this experiment including the factors in a table as seen on page 333.
Below is a list of designs we have learned. Select as many as are applicable and clearly explain why this study fits the designs selected.
Archival Research |
Meta-Analysis |
Baseline Design |
Mixed Design |
Baseline designs: AB, ABA, ABAB, Multifactor, multiple-baseline, single factor |
Mixed Methods Design |
Behavioral baseline |
Multiple –Baseline Design |
Between Subjects Design |
Multiple Control Design |
Case History |
Naturalistic Observation |
Changing Criterion Design |
Nested Design |
Cohort- Sequential Design |
Nonequivalent Control Group Design |
Content Analysis |
Nonparametric Design |
Correlational Design |
Parametric Design |
Cross-Sectional Design |
Pretest-Postest Design |
Discrete Trials Design |
Qualitative Design |
Dynamic Design |
Quantitative Design |
Equivalent Time Samples Design |
Quasi- Experimental Design |
Ethnography |
Randomized Two-Group Design |
Experimental Design |
Single factor/ Factorial etc. (1x1, 2x2, 2,3 etc.) |
Interrupted Time Series Design |
Single Subject Design |
Longitudinal Design |
Solomon Four group Design |
Matched-Group Design |
Survey Research |
Matched-Pairs Design |
Time Series Design |
|
Within Subjects Design |
Participants
Describe the participants, their location, recruitment, and any other descriptions appropriate for a Participant section.
Materials
List and describe the materials used.
Titles of Measures Go Here in Black. Describe the measure used. Address the reliability and validity for each as best as you can, demonstrating a clear understanding for these terms.
Use the following information in red to help with this (do not use this verbatim, paraphrase). Make sure to cover both reliability of the measures as well as all validity of the measures that may apply (face, content, construct, convergent, predictive, discriminant, concurrent). Pay attention to what these tasks measure, not to the tasks themselves as they have found to equally measure the SAME variable (hint- this is the DV). You are NOT comparing the tasks here, they are just different ways of assessing the same variable.
Task 1’s experiment is called Response Time Task A; Task 2’s experiment is called Response Time Task B. Both appear in Phase 1 and Phase 2. Both experiments measure response time by calculating your response time plus 3 seconds for errors. Both Tasks (experiments) have been tested for compatibility and have been found to be equivalent measures of response time despite their differences in appearance. Thus, there is no reason to reassess the methods of gathering response time or differences between these measures. These should be viewed as equal measures of response time. In the (fake) research, Keiser (2017) found the Response Time Task A measure demonstrated high test-retest reliability when administered a month apart on the same group of college students (N = 56) with a correlation of .94. Keiser (2016) found the Response Time Task B measure demonstrated high test-retest reliability when administered a month a part on the same group of college students (N = 74) with a correlation of .95.
Procedure
Describe the procedure for this study in your own words. This should include enough information to be replicated. Make sure to clearly express the manipulation in the study.
2
RSM802 Week 6 Lab Template
Methodology
Hypothesis
H1
H0
Variables
IV
Type of IV
DV
Type of DV
CV
Type of CV
Design
Participants
Materials
Titles of Measures Go Here in Black
Procedure
2

Get help from top-rated tutors in any subject.
Efficiently complete your homework and academic assignments by getting help from the experts at homeworkarchive.com